YouZum

Uncategorized

AI, Committee, 新闻, Uncategorized

The Download: a nuclear landmark, and China eyes Nvidia chips

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. Four nuclear reactors hit a big milestone in the US —Casey Crownhart I was really looking forward to July 4, and not just because I love a poolside barbecue. This year the American holiday also marked a big symbolic deadline for US nuclear power. Last year the Trump administration set a goal to see three new microreactors achieve criticality, a technical milestone establishing that a reactor can sustain a chain reaction, by the nation’s 250th birthday. And just in time, not just three, but four reactors did so. It’s a positive sign for nuclear technologies at a time of increasing need for electricity and emissions-free energy sources. But achieving criticality doesn’t mean a reactor is ready to provide electricity for the grid (or at all, for that matter). Here’s what the milestone could mean for nuclear power in the US—and where the four companies might go next. This story is from The Spark, our weekly climate tech newsletter. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Wednesday. The must-reads I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology. 1 China plans to let its top AI firms buy Nvidia H200 chipsAlibaba, ByteDance, and DeepSeek are set to get permission. (Information $)+ China had previously withheld approval despite US authorization. (Reuters $) 2 NATO is building a network to stop Russian attackers in their tracksIt will use sensors, drones, satellites, and AI to detect them. (Business Insider)+ Troops are donning odd camouflage to elude drones. (Economist $)+ The US wants cheaper drones as Iran’s wrecking its Reapers. (Ars Technica) 3 Researchers have a new idea to fight future El Niños: dimming the sunDeflecting solar energy could cool the ocean and mitigate the risks. (Wired $)+ But there could be unexpected consequences. (New Scientist $)+ And geoengineering as a field is getting a reality check. (MIT Technology Review) 4 Meta is patenting an AI device that records users to analyse emotionsIt ostensibly aims to tailor workout plans to the user’s mood. (404 Media)+ AI memory is privacy’s next frontier. (MIT Technology Review) 5 Chipmakers are going vertical as Moore’s Law slowsThey’re stacking transistors to keep chips advancing. (Economist $)+ IBM is betting on the technique. (MIT Technology Review) 6 Ivy League students suspected of AI cheating saw scores fall in personFrom 96% all the way down to 48%. (Ars Technica)+ AI giants want to take over the classroom. (MIT Technology Review) 7 A new study says parents’ phone addictions damage bonds with kidsIt can exacerbate “insecure attachment” for life. (Bloomberg $)+ And make children more anxious and avoidant. (Gizmodo) 8 A judge approved Musk’s $1.5 million Twitter settlement with the SECDespite what she called “serious misgivings” and “red flags.” (Reuters $)+ Musk was accused of skirting stock disclosure rules. (Fortune) 9 Shoebox-sized “detector satellites” could find nuclear bombs in spaceCubesats carrying the detector could sense a bomb’s radiation. (Space)+ Russia is suspected of developing space-based nukes. (Reuters $) 10 A World Cup match drove Google Search traffic to a new recordThe milestone came after Argentina’s comeback against Egypt. (CNBC) Quote of the day “I talk about it on Tic Tac.” —President Donald Trump tells the public where to find his insights on the dangers of communism, Gizmodo reports. One More Thing Robots are bringing new life to extinct species Paleontologists aren’t easily deterred by evolutionary dead ends or a sparse fossil record. And in the last few years, they’ve developed a new trick for turning back time and studying prehistoric animals: building experimental robotic models of them.  In the absence of a living specimen, an ambling, flying, swimming, or slithering automaton is the next best thing for studying the behavior of extinct organisms. Learning more about how they moved can in turn shed light on their lives, such as their historic ranges and feeding habits. Scientists can simply sit back and observe their behavior in different environments.  Read the full story on the rise of paleo-inspired robots—and four examples that are shedding light on creatures of yore. —Shi En Kim We can still have nice things A place for comfort, fun, and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.) + Georgia Hill’s monochrome artworks are filled with visual harmony.+ AI has salvaged text from a papyrus scroll burned to a crisp when Mount Vesuvius erupted 2,000 years ago.+ Rare images taken by a Japanese space probe show a near-Earth asteroid resembling a cuddly snowman.+ “Another One Bites the Bee Gees” smoothly merges two classic tracks with a 4/4 time signature into the perfect song for applying CPR.

The Download: a nuclear landmark, and China eyes Nvidia chips Read Post »

AI, Committee, 新闻, Uncategorized

NVIDIA’s Cosmos-Framework Tutorial: Designing a Colab-Friendly Miniature of Cosmos 3 World Models with Omnimodal Mixture-of-Transformers

In this tutorial, we explore NVIDIA’s cosmos-framework from a practical Colab-friendly angle while staying honest about the hardware limits of running real Cosmos 3 checkpoints. We begin by checking the current runtime, GPU capabilities, CUDA availability, memory, and disk space to understand why full Cosmos 3 inference is not realistic on standard Colab hardware. Instead of stopping there, we use the framework’s real structure, CLI surface, input schema, and model modes as the foundation for a hands-on miniature implementation. We then build and train a compact omnimodal Mixture-of-Transformers world model that mirrors the core Cosmos idea: shared cross-modal attention with modality-specific expert routing for text, vision, and action streams. Using synthetic physical-world data, training-loss tracking, and an autoregressive rollout, we show how the model learns relationships across modalities and predicts future latent states in a simplified yet technically meaningful way. Probing Colab Hardware Limits Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser import os, sys, json, time, math, textwrap, subprocess, shutil, platform from pathlib import Path def rule(title=””): line = “=” * 86 print(“n” + line + (“n ” + title if title else “”) + “n” + line) def spark(vals, width=60): “””Tiny ASCII sparkline for a 1-D sequence (works with no plotting libs).””” if not vals: return “” blocks = “▁▂▃▄▅▆▇█” lo, hi = min(vals), max(vals) rng = (hi – lo) or 1.0 step = max(1, len(vals) // width) s = “”.join(blocks[min(len(blocks) – 1, int((v – lo) / rng * (len(blocks) – 1)))] for v in vals[::step]) return s rule(“SECTION 0 — Environment probe: what you have vs. what Cosmos 3 actually needs”) IN_COLAB = “google.colab” in sys.modules print(f”Running inside Google Colab : {IN_COLAB}”) print(f”Python : {platform.python_version()} ({platform.system()})”) try: import torch except ModuleNotFoundError: print(“torch not found — installing CPU build (a few seconds)…”) subprocess.run([sys.executable, “-m”, “pip”, “install”, “-q”, “torch”], check=False) import torch print(f”PyTorch : {torch.__version__}”) CUDA_OK = torch.cuda.is_available() DEVICE = torch.device(“cuda” if CUDA_OK else “cpu”) gpu_name, gpu_mem_gb, cc = “None (CPU)”, 0.0, (0, 0) if CUDA_OK: p = torch.cuda.get_device_properties(0) gpu_name = p.name gpu_mem_gb = p.total_memory / 1024**3 cc = torch.cuda.get_device_capability(0) print(f”CUDA build : {torch.version.cuda}”) print(f”GPU : {gpu_name}”) print(f”GPU memory : {gpu_mem_gb:.1f} GiB”) print(f”Compute capability : sm_{cc[0]}{cc[1]}”) try: free_gb = shutil.disk_usage(‘/’).free / 1024**3 print(f”Free disk : {free_gb:.0f} GiB”) except Exception: free_gb = 0.0 AMPERE = cc[0] >= 8 reqs = [ (“GPU architecture”, “Ampere+ (sm_80+, A100/RTX30xx)”, “OK” if AMPERE else “TOO OLD (T4=sm_75)”), (“GPU memory”, “>=80 GiB for Nano-16B (single H100)”, “OK” if gpu_mem_gb >= 79 else f”{gpu_mem_gb:.0f} GiB — insufficient”), (“CUDA toolkit”, “>=12.8”, “check” ), (“Free disk”, “~150 GiB first run (~1 TB HF cache)”, “OK” if free_gb >= 150 else f”{free_gb:.0f} GiB — insufficient”), (“Attention kernels”,”FlashAttn-3 (Hopper) / FA2 (Ampere)”, “needs Ampere+”), ] print(“n Can this machine run the REAL Cosmos 3 checkpoints?”) print(” ” + “-” * 82) print(f” {‘Requirement’:<18}{‘Cosmos 3 needs’:<38}{‘You have’}”) print(” ” + “-” * 82) for k, need, have in reqs: print(f” {k:<18}{need:<38}{have}”) print(” ” + “-” * 82) VERDICT = AMPERE and gpu_mem_gb >= 79 and free_gb >= 150 print(f” VERDICT: {‘This machine could attempt Nano-16B.’ if VERDICT else ‘NO — real Cosmos 3 inference is not possible here. Educational path below.’}”) We begin by preparing the runtime utilities and checking whether the current machine can realistically support Cosmos 3 inference. We inspect Python, PyTorch, CUDA, GPU memory, compute capability, and available disk space to compare our environment against the actual hardware requirements. We then print a clear verdict explaining why the real 16B+ Cosmos checkpoints cannot usually run on standard Colab hardware. Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser rule(“SECTION 1 — Clone & map the real cosmos_framework package (source of truth)”) Mapping The Cosmos-Framework Package Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser REPO = “https://github.com/NVIDIA/cosmos-framework.git” DST = Path(“/content/cosmos-framework”) if Path(“/content”).exists() else Path(“cosmos-framework”) cloned = False try: if not DST.exists(): print(f”Shallow-cloning {REPO} …”) subprocess.run([“git”, “clone”, “–depth”, “1”, REPO, str(DST)], check=True, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=180) cloned = DST.exists() except Exception as e: print(f”(Clone skipped/failed — offline is fine, tutorial continues.) {e}”) if cloned: print(f”Repo at: {DST}n”) pkg = DST / “cosmos_framework” if pkg.exists(): print(“cosmos_framework/ subpackages (the real code layout):”) for child in sorted(pkg.iterdir()): if child.is_dir() and not child.name.startswith((“_”, “.”)): n_py = len(list(child.rglob(“*.py”))) print(f” • {child.name:<20} ({n_py:>3} .py files)”) example = DST / “inputs” / “omni” / “t2v.json” if example.exists(): print(f”nReal example input spec ({example.relative_to(DST)}):”) print(textwrap.indent(example.read_text().strip(), ” “)) else: print(“Proceeding without a local clone (we already extracted the real schema/CLI).”) print(“”” Real CLI surface (docs/inference.md): Single GPU : python -m cosmos_framework.scripts.inference \ –parallelism-preset=latency -i “inputs/omni/t2v.json” \ -o outputs/omni_nano –checkpoint-path Cosmos3-Nano –seed 0 Multi GPU : torchrun –nproc-per-node=8 -m cosmos_framework.scripts.inference \ –parallelism-preset=throughput -i “inputs/omni/*.json” \ -o outputs/omni_super –checkpoint-path Cosmos3-Super –seed 0 Models : Cosmos3-Nano (16B, all modes) | Cosmos3-Super (65B, t2i/t2v/i2v) Modes : text2image · text2video · image2video · video2video · forward_dynamics · inverse_dynamics · policy Parallelism: FSDP dp-shard / dp-replicate · context (cp) · CFG (cfgp) presets {latency, throughput} Guardrails : Cosmos-Guardrail1 + Qwen3Guard-Gen-0.6B + RetinaFace (on by default) “””) rule(“SECTION 2 — Omnimodal Mixture-of-Transformers (MoT) world model — the idea”) print(r””” Cosmos 3 unifies language, image, video, audio and ACTION in ONE model. The key trick is a Mixture-of-Transformers: every modality is turned into tokens placed on a SINGLE interleaved sequence; SELF-ATTENTION is SHARED across all modalities (so vision can be conditioned on text, actions on vision, etc.), but each token is processed by a MODALITY-SPECIFIC expert feed-forward block (“Mixture-of-Transformers” routing). text tokens vision tokens action tokens [t0 t1 t2 …] [v0 v1 v2 …] [a0 a1 …] | / | / +———– one sequence ———–+ | ┌─────────── shared causal self-attention (RoPE) ───────────┐ │ every token attends to all earlier tokens, ANY modality │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ | route each token to its modality’s EXPERT FFN (SwiGLU): text→Expert0 vision→Expert1 action→Expert2 | per-modality heads: next-token / next-latent / next-action Physical-AI modes fall right out of this one model: text2video = generate the vision-token stream from a text prompt image2video = condition vision stream on a first frame + text forward_dynamics= given frames + ACTIONS, roll future frames forward (a world model) inverse_dynamics= given frames, infer the ACTIONS that caused them policy =

NVIDIA’s Cosmos-Framework Tutorial: Designing a Colab-Friendly Miniature of Cosmos 3 World Models with Omnimodal Mixture-of-Transformers Read Post »

AI, Committee, 新闻, Uncategorized

BlueMagpie-TTS: A Token-Efficient Tokenizer, Language Model, and TTS for Taiwanese-Accent Code-Switching Speech

arXiv:2607.06054v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Off-the-shelf TTS systems are poorly adapted to Taiwanese Mandarin. Their accent defaults to other Mandarin variants, their tokenizers over-segment common Taiwanese text, and their pronunciation degrades at code-switching boundaries where Chinese and English alternate within one utterance. These problems share one root: the text side lacks adaptation to the Taiwanese context. We address the text side from the bottom up. PangolinTokenizer, a byte-level BPE tokenizer trained on Taiwan-context data, reaches the lowest token rate (0.485 tokens/character) with the smallest vocabulary among nine tokenizers. Barbet, a billion-parameter Traditional-Chinese language model trained on PangolinTokenizer, serves as the text-semantic frontend and ranks first among comparable public models on a 14-task evaluation. BlueMagpie-TTS attaches Barbet to the pretrained acoustic stack of VoxCPM2 through a learned bridge, keeping the acoustic stack fixed. On a 1000-sentence Taiwan-localized test set, it lowers CER from 11.45% to 4.81% and WER from 14.83% to 5.36%, relative reductions of 58.0% and 63.9%. In a blind listening study on 500 of these sentences with ten listeners, 65.6% of majority votes prefer BlueMagpie-TTS.

BlueMagpie-TTS: A Token-Efficient Tokenizer, Language Model, and TTS for Taiwanese-Accent Code-Switching Speech Read Post »

AI, Committee, 新闻, Uncategorized

The Download: worms fight pollution, and geoengineering faces reality

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. Why worms (and microbes) are catching on as a manure pollution solution Anthony Agueda, a third-generation California dairy farmer, pulls a rake through a bed of dark, wet wood chips to reveal a half-dozen squirming red earthworms. There are likely hundreds of thousands more wriggling just under the surface. The worms and microbes are part of a “vermifiltration” system that cleans manure wastewater. The approach may dramatically cut methane, nitrous oxide, and water pollution. Vermifiltration is just one of a variety of methods that farmers, companies, and scientists are employing to drive down manure pollution as the livestock industry faces growing pressure to address the environmental harms from one of the smelliest parts of the business. Explore how the humble earthworm could reshape the future of sustainable farming. —James Temple MIT Technology Review Narrated: geoengineering gets a reality check Solar geoengineering, the controversial idea that we could deliberately intervene in the climate system to counteract global warming, is moving beyond computer simulations and into the practical engineering challenges required to make it real. Researchers are now working on aircraft, materials, and other systems for solar geoengineering. But as they delve into these details, they’re finding that even early deployment would require significant new infrastructure, time, and investment. —James Temple This is our latest story to be turned into an MIT Technology Review Narrated podcast, which we publish each week on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. Just navigate to MIT Technology Review Narrated on either platform, and follow us to get all our new content as it’s released. The must-reads I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology. 1 The Trump administration has lifted restrictions on OpenAI’s GPT 5.6The green light came after additional testing and meetings. (Axios)+ OpenAI subsequently said it will launch widely tomorrow. (Bloomberg $) + The rollout had been delayed due to security concerns. (Verge)+ Does AI know too much? (MIT Technology Review) 2 China is looking at curbing overseas access to its top AI modelsAlibaba, ByteDance, and Z.ai attended meetings about the plan. (Reuters $)+ Beijing is also weighing the security risks of open-weight AI. (SCMP)+ And has issued a “backdoor” security alert over Claude Code. (CNBC) 3 European NATO allies have unveiled a $50 billion high-tech missile planThey will engineer stealth and high-speed hypersonic weapons. (BBC)+ Which can strike targets at least 300 km away. (Reuters $)+ The Dutch and British are also developing amphibious ships. (Bloomberg $) 4 Meta is testing “super sensing” AI glasses that record every momentIt plans to disable privacy LEDs that alert people when they’re “on.” (FT $)+ It’s also released an AI image generator. (NYT $)+ Which lets anyone use your Instagram photos in AI images. (Wired $) 5 China’s DeepSeek is developing its own AI chip, sources sayIt could reduce the company’s reliance on Nvidia and Huawei. (Bloomberg $)+ DeepSeek V4 was a win for Chinese chipmakers. (MIT Technology Review) 6 Wikipedia is fighting to survive the internet’s next eraIt’s under attack from MAGA, AI raids, and repressive regimes. (NYT $)+ AI has given Wikipedia a language problem. (MIT Technology Review) 7 SpaceX plans to launch its first model coproduced with CursorThe new frontier model could arrive as soon as this week. (Information $)+ It’s built with AI startup Cursor, which SpaceX is buying for $60 billion. (FT $) 8 A new academic “humanizer” tool can erase signs of AI-written textBut researchers are very divided over its potential impact. (Nature $) 9 Scientists have detected a mystery chemical on Pluto and TitanIt appears to absorb light in a way we don’t currently understand. (Wired $) 10 A Waymo robotaxi reportedly called the cops on drinking teensOfficers then approached the vehicle with guns drawn. (404 Media) Quote of the day “Parents do you know where your teens are? Waymo does!”  —Local police post on Facebook that a Waymo in California called the cops on two teenagers for “drinking and shooting from the vehicle.” One More Thing MICHAEL BYERS Your boss is watching Dora Manriquez has spent nine years driving for Uber and Lyft, where every ride she accepts or rejects is tracked by the apps she relies on for work. Having found herself unable to score enough better-­paying rides, she has had to file for bankruptcy.  App-based employers aren’t the only ones keeping a very close eye on workers today. Jobs today—whether in an office, a warehouse, or your car—can mean constant electronic surveillance with little transparency, and potentially with livelihood-ending consequences if your productivity flags. All that data is shifting the relationships between workers and managers—and protections are lagging. Read the full story on the widening power imbalance it’s created. —Rebecca Ackermann We can still have nice things A place for comfort, fun, and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.) + Literary worlds collide in this marvellous Dr Seuss/Stephen King mashup.+ A daring snorkeler saved a dolphin from a suckerfish—and then celebrated with its whole pod.+ This clever musical project seamlessly constructs an original song from vocal snippets of 50 artists singing US city names.+ A long-lost wallet from 1970 was recently unearthed, creating a cute time capsule from its owner’s high school years.

The Download: worms fight pollution, and geoengineering faces reality Read Post »

AI, Committee, 新闻, Uncategorized

OpenAI Releases GPT-Live and GPT-Live-1 mini: Full-Duplex Voice Models That Delegate Deeper Reasoning to GPT-5.5

Today, OpenAI released GPT-Live. It is a new generation of voice models. GPT-Live now powers the ChatGPT Voice experience. The stated goal is natural, real-time conversation with AI. Two versions ship first: GPT-Live-1 and GPT-Live-1 mini. Both roll out to ChatGPT users globally today. TL;DR GPT-Live is a full-duplex voice model family that listens and speaks at once. It delegates search and reasoning to GPT-5.5 while keeping the conversation flowing. GPT-Live-1 and mini were strongly preferred over Advanced Voice Mode in human tests. It ships today to ChatGPT users globally; the API is planned soon. Video, screen sharing, and full multilingual parity are not available at launch. What is GPT-Live? GPT-Live is built on a full-duplex architecture. Full-duplex means the model can listen and speak at the same time. During a conversation, it can add short cues like ‘mhmm’ or ‘yeah.’ It can engage in quick back-and-forth, or stay quiet when you think. For questions needing web search, deeper reasoning, or complex work, GPT-Live delegates. It hands the task to a frontier model behind the scenes. The result returns to the conversation when it is ready. At launch, that background model is GPT-5.5. While the frontier model works, GPT-Live keeps the conversation going. Why Cascaded and Turn-Based Voice Fell Short Earlier voice systems moved toward natural conversation, but with tradeoffs. Cascaded voice systems chained three separate models per turn. A speech-to-text model transcribed your speech first. A large language model then produced a response. A text-to-speech model converted that text back into audio. This let people talk to frontier models for the first time. But information could be lost across models, and responses were slow and stilted. Turn-based voice models, like ChatGPT Advanced Voice Mode, processed audio inside one model. That reduced latency and made conversations smoother. They still operated through discrete turns, waiting for the user to stop speaking. Turn detection was based on silence. A brief pause or background noise could be mistaken for the end of a turn. This caused the model to interrupt at unnatural times. Dimension Cascaded (original ChatGPT Voice) Turn-based (Advanced Voice Mode) Full-duplex (GPT-Live) Pipeline STT → LLM → TTS, three models Single model handling audio Single model, continuous processing Turn handling Discrete turns Discrete turns, silence-based Continuous, decisions many times/sec Listen while speaking No No Yes Backchannels (“mhmm”) No No Yes Latency feel Slow, stilted, long pauses Faster, smoother, still rigid Fast, natural, expressive Interrupt handling Not supported Can misfire on pauses/noise Can pause, interrupt, resume Deeper work In-line LLM In-line model Delegates to GPT-5.5 in background The Two Architectural Changes GPT-Live addresses these limits with two changes: Continuous interaction using full-duplex processing: The model processes input while generating output at the same time. It can make interaction decisions many times per second. Those decisions include whether to speak, continue listening, pause, interrupt, or invoke a tool. This supports more natural back-and-forth and a better sense of time. It also enables live translation. Delegation for deeper work: OpenAI decoupled continuous interaction from heavier reasoning. When a task needs search, reasoning, or more agentic capabilities, GPT-Live delegates it. Another model, such as GPT-5.5, handles that work in the background. Meanwhile, GPT-Live keeps the conversation flowing. This design also lets GPT-Live adopt newer frontier models as they ship. What OpenAI’s Evaluations Show OpenAI built new human evaluations for pleasantness and conversational flow. Evaluators compared models in matched five-to-ten-minute conversations. In these head-to-head tests, GPT-Live-1 and GPT-Live-1 mini were strongly preferred over Advanced Voice Mode. The comparisons measured overall preference, turn-taking, interruptions, flow, and how natural each interaction felt. On automated benchmarks, GPT-Live-1 also showed gains over Advanced Voice Mode: GPQA: GPT-Live-1 substantially outperforms it on expert-level science reasoning. BrowseComp: GPT-Live-1 shows strong gains on agentic web search. τ³-Voice Telecom (internal variant): GPT-Live-1 outperforms it on multi-turn telecom support tasks. OpenAI team notes it used a customized user model for the τ³-Voice Telecom eval. That user model was powered by its latest reasoning models. GPT-Live-1 (instant) and GPT-Live-1 mini use GPT-5.5 Instant in the background. GPT-Live-1 Medium and GPT-Live-1 High use GPT-5.5 Thinking with medium and high reasoning effort. GPT-Live: Full-Duplex Voice Explorer Use Cases With Examples Hands-free help: ask for cooking steps or directions without touching a screen. Language practice: hold a back-and-forth chat with gentle corrections. Live translation: full-duplex timing supports translating speech during a conversation. Research on the go: ask a hard question on your commute; GPT-5.5 searches in the background. Support workflows: multi-turn telecom-style tasks map to the τ³-Voice Telecom evaluation. Visual lookups: see weather, stocks, or sports as cards while you talk. A Conceptual Look at the Full-Duplex Loop The API is not available yet. So this is a runnable, illustrative simulation of the decision loop. It is a teaching model of the architecture, not the actual GPT-Live API. You can run it as plain Python to see the flow. Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser “””Illustrative simulation of the GPT-Live full-duplex decision loop. Teaching model of the described architecture, NOT the real API.””” import random random.seed(7) # reproducible output class BackgroundModel: # stands in for GPT-5.5 def run(self, query): return f”answer to ‘{query}'” class GPTLive: def __init__(self, background): self.background = background self.pending = None # a delegated task, if one is running def decide(self, user_speaking, needs_deep_work): # A real model makes this choice many times per second. if self.pending is not None: return “await_delegate” if needs_deep_work: return “delegate” if user_speaking: return random.choice([“listen”, “backchannel”]) return “speak” def step(self, frame): action = self.decide(frame[“user_speaking”], frame[“needs_deep_work”]) if action == “delegate”: self.pending = frame[“query”] # hand off, keep talking return ‘speak -> “one sec, still with you”‘ if action == “await_delegate”: result = self.background.run(self.pending) # background result self.pending = None return f’speak -> “{result}”‘ if action == “backchannel”: return ‘backchannel-> “mhmm” (while user talks)’ if action == “listen”: return “listen -> (quiet, attending)” return “speak -> (normal reply)” # A short scripted stream of audio frames the loop consumes in order. stream = [ {“user_speaking”: True, “needs_deep_work”: False, “query”: None}, {“user_speaking”: True, “needs_deep_work”: False,

OpenAI Releases GPT-Live and GPT-Live-1 mini: Full-Duplex Voice Models That Delegate Deeper Reasoning to GPT-5.5 Read Post »

AI, Committee, 新闻, Uncategorized

Why worms (and microbes) are catching on as a manure pollution solution

Anthony Agueda, a third-generation California dairy farmer, pulls a rake through a bed of dark, wet wood chips on his family’s land in Hickman, a tiny town in the state’s agricultural heartland. He reaches down with both hands and pulls up a clump of muck, turning it over to reveal a half-dozen squirming red earthworms. There are likely hundreds of thousands more wriggling just under the surface of the three-foot mound of wood and crushed river rock before us, which stretches across the equivalent of six football fields. These natural materials form a biofilter that may dramatically cut the methane, nitrous oxide, and water pollution generated by the massive amounts of manure that hundreds of Holstein cows produce each day. Agueda’s family business, the Alberto Dairy, was one of the first cattle operations in California to adopt this approach to manure treatment, developed and patented by the Chilean company BioFiltro. Eight more of these so-called vermifiltration systems are already operating on US dairies, according to the company, while another 16 are under construction or set to be next year, nearly all of them in California.  Vermifiltration is just one of a variety of methods that farmers, companies, and scientists are employing to drive down manure pollution as the livestock industry faces growing pressure to address the environmental harms from one of the smelliest parts of the business. California, easily the nation’s largest milk producer, has established a handful of programs to promote their adoption, including one initiative that has funneled more than a billion dollars to farms. Researchers stress that much more work needs to be done to determine the most effective approaches, the trade-offs between them, and their success over the long term, under actual farm conditions. Agueda says that he and his family recognized the need to adopt new practices as environmental rules tightened. They were drawn to vermifiltration because it’s simple and relatively cheap compared with other, higher-tech options. “California daily farmers are constantly facing more and more regulation,” says Agueda, standing alongside one of the farm’s free-stall barns. “This makes me excited, because it shows how we are part of the solution.” The growing manure problem Manure is responsible for a significant portion of the climate pollution from livestock operations. The World Resources Institute estimates that manure management on dairy and swine farms accounts for 1.6% of the US’s greenhouse-gas emissions. Globally, manure storage and processing makes up about 10% of the livestock industry’s contributions to climate change.  “Farms have become larger in the past two decades or so, so there’s much more manure—and that has to be stored somewhere,” says Swati Hegde, the organization’s global manager of agricultural methane. Typically, cattle and swine farms spray manure into lagoons or tanks, creating a foul-smelling, low-oxygen slurry in which microorganisms known as methanogens thrive. They gobble up hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and other compounds and produce methane as a by-product. Other microbes in the mix produce smaller amounts of nitrous oxide. A pair of Holstein cows poke their heads through the rails of a free-stall barn at the Alberto Dairy.JOE PROUDMAN/UC DAVIS Both are particularly potent greenhouse gases, with as much as 30 to nearly 275 times the warming power of carbon dioxide, respectively, over a century. The slurry is often spread onto fields to add nutrients to the soil. When it’s done excessively or improperly, this part of the practice can pollute soil or groundwater with drug residues, pathogens like salmonella and E. coli, and nitrates. Nitrates that leach into drinking water have been linked to a variety of human health risks. And those that flow into rivers, lakes, and coastal waters can spawn algae blooms that poison fish, block sunlight, suck up oxygen, or form large coastal dead zones devoid of marine life. Policy drivers A number of regions, nations, and states have passed regulations or offered subsidies designed to limit the pollution from livestock manure, but so far, most of the major initiatives have focused on water contamination rather than greenhouse-gas emissions. The European Union, for instance, restricts the amount of manure that farmers can apply to fields and requires member nations to monitor nitrate levels in ground and surface water. The US’s Clean Water Act requires large livestock operations to obtain permits and develop manure management plans that limit pollution.  But California has arguably done the most to use government policy specifically to drive down the methane emissions from livestock. The dairy industry accounts for about 45% of the state’s pollution from the potent greenhouse gas, and more than half of that comes from manure, according to the government’s estimates.  In 2016, the state enacted a law that requires dairies, landfills, and other businesses to cut methane emissions 40% below 2013 levels by 2030, as part of a broader effort to reduce pollution from powerful but short-lived greenhouse gases. The measure directed the California Air Resources Board, the state’s main climate regulatory agency, to set up various incentive programs to encourage these industries to shift to cleaner practices.  “In terms of bang for your buck, short-term benefits, methane can go a long way toward reaching climate goals,” says Tawny Mata, director of California’s Office of Agricultural Resilience and Sustainability.  Between these various programs—and falling livestock numbers in the state—the dairy sector is on track to reduce annual methane emissions by the equivalent of 5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide by 2030, the state estimates. That would still fall about 4 million tons short of the target under the 2016 law. The downsides of dairy digesters Excluding the decline in herd populations—which has been driven by growing international competition and rising costs—the vast majority of California’s estimated methane reductions come from the use of what are known as anaerobic digesters. This technology entails covering the slurry lagoons to prevent methane from leaking into the air and then piping the biogas into separate vessels, where it’s cleaned and converted into natural gas.  Under California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard program, dairies that use digesters to produce

Why worms (and microbes) are catching on as a manure pollution solution Read Post »

AI, Committee, 新闻, Uncategorized

The foundational elements of AI architecture that IT leaders need to scale

With the rapid progress of AI capabilities and the move to agentic systems, organizations are expanding their use cases as the technology continues to grow. That constant evolution also introduces risk, leaving IT leaders to wonder which investments will prove valuable even six months into the future. Returning to the foundational elements of AI architecture—the structural framework required for deploying and managing reliable, integrated AI systems at scale—allows technology leaders to make astute decisions today while supporting a future of AI agents that can retrieve information, make decisions, and execute complex workflows across systems. Four elements of AI architecture you can count on The following capabilities provide a stable compass on the path to production-ready deployment, regardless of how the underlying technology evolves. 1. Prepare data for AI at scale Models are only as reliable as the data they can access, and poor data quality leads to AI hallucinations, bias, and unreliable outputs. Most enterprises rely on legacy systems, inconsistent data structures, fragmented ownership, and incomplete datasets, making it difficult to scale AI effectively. Powerful as it is, AI itself cannot solve these underlying data problems. As Adnan Adil, CIO of Elastic, explains: “The data is a durable part of AI architecture because without it, these models won’t run, won’t provide the right context, or won’t give the right level of services that we’re looking to implement.” Industry surveys consistently cite data quality as one of the greatest barriers to AI success. “The data quality has to be good; otherwise, the user loses confidence in the system,” says Adil. An effective AI strategy begins with connecting data across the organization and ensuring it is organized, accurate, governed, and accessible in real time. These considerations are most effective when built into models and architecture from the start. Scalable data architecture allows AI systems to evolve alongside the business and connect reliably to the internal information needed to deliver meaningful value. Gartner predicts that companies will abandon 60% of all AI projects through 2026 if they are not supported by AI-ready data. Avoiding that outcome includes clear data standards and ownership, clean and labeled data, and pipelines that support real-time retrieval. 2. Use context engineering to deliver the right data to every AI query Context engineering ensures that the model draws on the most pertinent information for each query, selecting and organizing the data needed to produce accurate answers efficiently. Effective context engineering shapes the inputs that guide AI reasoning and action. While prompt engineering focuses on how a request is worded, context engineering designs the entire information environment around the model: retrieving the right data and presenting it in a structured, machine-readable way. Many organizations are discovering that reliable AI depends as much on context quality as on the strength of the model. Context engineering relies on a modernized, unified data foundation as well as retrieval and memory systems such as retrieval augmented generation (RAG) and vector databases. It also requires careful prioritization to determine what information matters most, what should be excluded, and when different types of information should be used. Feeding models too much context can dilute relevant details, increase costs, and slow response times. “Minimum context, correct and current data, and machine-readable information are critical to effective context engineering,” Adil says. 3. Build AI governance and LLM observability in from the start Strong governance and LLM observability help organizations maintain control over how AI systems use data, monitor system performance, and identify problems before they affect operations. In the absence of clear controls around retrieval, workflows, and model usage, AI systems often process far more information than necessary. This inefficiency also drives up operating costs by requiring additional computing resources, often reflected in higher token consumption and API charges. Governance also works in tandem with robust security. AI expands the attack surface, introducing risks such as prompt-based data leakage, model vulnerabilities, and adversarial inputs. Protecting sensitive information requires strong access controls, monitoring, and oversight. Adil notes that essential controls — including those related to security, granular cost management, project controls, data security, and architecture—are frequently insufficient. For governance systems to support transparent, compliant, trustworthy, and cost-effective AI, organizations cannot leave them as a layer to add later. Governance structures need to be embedded into architecture, workflows, and decision-making processes from the outset. When governance is established from the start, it enables robust observability. Observability helps organizations understand how AI applications are performing in practice. Mechanisms for LLM observability and benchmarking allow teams to assess accuracy and utility over time, monitor adoption patterns, and adjust systems as conditions change. Observability also helps organizations gain trust by increasing visibility of model performance, behavior, and failure points. Furthermore, observability is essential to get ROI of AI initiatives, as the benefits of it are often indirect and business value depends heavily on how systems are adopted and used. Real-time visibility into AI behavior allows organizations to measure performance against expectations, identify gaps between intent and reality, and continuously refine systems as requirements evolve. In a 2026 report from Elastic, 85% of IT decision makers expect to enable LLM observability for their internal generative AI apps. “Observability is actually huge. We can use observability data for cost control, decision-making, and engineering efficiency,” Adil says. 4. Keep humans in the loop The thoughtful design, integration, and governance that maximize AI value demand specialized in-house expertise. Nearly 70% of respondents in Deloitte’s 2025 Tech Executive Survey report plan to grow teams in direct response to generative AI, a clear contrast to widely reported AI-related cuts. Adil agrees: “We think the people aspect is largely what’s going to make AI impactful going forward.” As AI systems become more embedded in operations, organizations need people who can govern workflows, evaluate outputs, redesign processes, and adapt systems as conditions change. Evolution toward increasingly autonomous tools requires teams skilled in prompt engineering, orchestration, and change management.  Talent adept at critical thinking and prepared to adapt with technology’s rapid advances will be in high demand. Although turnover brings in

The foundational elements of AI architecture that IT leaders need to scale Read Post »

AI, Committee, 新闻, Uncategorized

The Download: your stake in OpenAI, and the Treasury’s AI warning

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. Your family’s $300 stake in OpenAI Sam Altman’s proposal that Americans should share in the wealth created by AI is back in the spotlight, with reports that he is discussing giving the US government a 5% stake in OpenAI. At the company’s current valuation, that stake would be worth roughly $320 per American household. The idea is meant to address concerns that AI companies are benefiting from human-generated work without compensating creators, while also easing fears that AI will cause a collapse of the labor market by providing a safety net.  The details, however, remain unclear. Indeed, the offer may be more powerful as a political narrative than as a policy plan. Read the full story on what the dividend proposal reveals about the future of AI. —James O’Donnell This article is from The Algorithm, our weekly AI newsletter. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Monday. The must-reads I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.  1 A leaked Treasury report compares the AI market to the dotcom bubble Which contradicts the administration’s public optimism about AI. (NOTUS)+ Fears that the market is overinflated are growing. (Reuters $)+ And AI profits are hiding bigger risks in earnings reports. (FT $)+ What even is the AI bubble? (MIT Technology Review) 2 Samsung profits have jumped 1,800% on booming AI chip salesIt just reported its third consecutive record quarterly profit. (BBC)+ But its shares slumped over fears that the AI boom will stall. (Reuters $)+ That boom has turned Samsung into a $1 trillion company. (CNBC) 3 A US cyber agency is using Mythos to audit government codeSources say CISA is tapping Anthropic’s model to search for bugs. (Reuters $)+ Agencies are using it despite Anthropic’s feud with the White House. (Axios) 4 Illinois’ governor has signed the nation’s strongest frontier AI lawIt’s designed to protect citizens from AI risks. (Gizmodo)+ US lawmakers are clashing over AI rules. (MIT Technology Review) 5 A hidden tracker in Claude Code has been exposed and removedIt secretly monitored users in China. (WP $)+ Critics said it shows Anthropic’s willingness to surveil users. (Ars Technica)+ The company has also found a hidden “thinking” space in Claude. (Axios) 6 Russia is suspected of flying drones over Europe from a shadow fleetThe flights were reportedly launched from commercial ships. (Ars Technica)+ Europe has a drone-filled vision for future wars. (MIT Technology Review) 7 A controversial AI “actor” is set to star in its first feature filmTilly Norwood will debut in a comedy-drama called “Misaligned.” (Variety)+ A major actors union has lambasted the AI creation. (NBC News) 8 AI costs are driving US companies toward Chinese modelsBusinesses are hunting for cheaper model alternatives. (CNBC)+ Chinese AI labs are betting big on open source. (MIT Technology Review) 9 Researchers have shown quantum proofs can beat classical onesThey found a problem that classical proofs can’t solve. (Quanta) 10 Earth will never be swallowed by the sun, according to new modelsBut it probably won’t be much fun to live here by that point anyway! (Wired $) Quote of the day “The goal might be to make machines in our image. But what I fear is that—perhaps without even quite noticing—we remake ourselves in theirs.”  —Reporter Sarah O’Connor sounds a note of caution in her new book, We Are Not Machines, the Guardian reports. One More Thing KATE DEHLER Adventures in the genetic time machine Eske Willerslev, a specialist in recovering DNA from old bones and objects, has made numerous breakthroughs. These include recovering the first more or less complete genome of an ancient human and 2.4-million-year-old genetic material from Greenland, revealing that today’s Arctic desert was once a forest with poplar, birch, and mastodons. These findings are part of a wave of discoveries from what’s being called an “ancient-DNA revolution.”  Beyond revealing stories of human migration and vanished ecosystems, scientists believe ancient DNA can unearth clues about modern diseases. It could even lead to a better food supply for our warming world. “And can we get that?” Willerslev asks. “Yes, I believe we can.” Discover how ancient DNA could rescue the future.  —Antonio Regalado We can still have nice things A place for comfort, fun, and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.) + Underworld’s electric set from EDC Las Vegas 2026 has been released as a full concert video.+ This photographic journey through global soccer culture captures the mad passion of fandom around the world.+ Feeling unhinged? Me too. This playlist of gloriously intense classical music sympathetically captures the mood.+ If you’re looking for visual inspiration, this collection of graphic design archives from across the web is a goldmine.

The Download: your stake in OpenAI, and the Treasury’s AI warning Read Post »

AI, Committee, 新闻, Uncategorized

Liquid AI Open-Sources Antidoom: A Final Token Preference Optimization (FTPO) Method that Reduces Doom Loops in Reasoning Models

Liquid AI has released Antidoom, an open-source method that targets a common failure mode in reasoning models. That failure mode is the doom loop. In a doom loop, a model emits a span. It then repeats that span again and again. The output continues until the context window is exhausted. Small reasoning models are more prone to this, especially on long thinking traces and hard problems. On an early checkpoint of LFM2.5-2.6B, 10.2% of completions on hard math and coding prompts produced repetitive loops. After Antidoom training, that rate fell to 1.4%. Eval scores improved across the board, attributable entirely to the reduced looping. TL;DR Antidoom reduces doom loops by retraining only the first loop-start token. FTPO spreads probability across multiple coherent alternatives, not one replacement. LFM2.5-2.6B looping fell 10.2% to 1.4%; Qwen3.5-4B fell 22.9% to 1%. The pipeline runs in a few hours, and the full stack is open source. What is Antidoom? Antidoom is a targeted fix, not a broad sampling change. It finds the exact token that begins a loop. It then trains the model to prefer coherent alternatives at that single position. The rest of the distribution stays largely untouched. The method adapts Antislop. It trains on chosen/rejected pairs that represent a single completion token. The training algorithm is Final Token Preference Optimization (FTPO), which is similar to DPO. The training teaches the model nothing new about math or code. It clears the looping that blocked answers the model could already produce. Anatomy of a Doom Loop Liquid AI team attributes doom loops to three mechanisms working together: Mechanism 1: overtrained tokens plus uncertainty. Some tokens are more likely to be selected in general. Well-known examples in the wild include ‘delve’ and ‘testament.’ Liquid AI team notes this can trace back to synthetic data in the training set. In reasoning traces, high-prior continuations often include discourse markers such as ‘Wait’ or ‘Alternatively.’ These tokens are not inherently bad. They can mark a useful change of strategy, a verification step, or a branch. When the model is uncertain or stuck, they instead become attractive fallback continuations. For an early LFM2.5-2.6B checkpoint, the most common loop-starting tokens were the following. Token Share of loop starts the 11.39% So 4.51% Alternatively 3.22% Wait 2.56% But 2.46% Mechanism 2: prior context reinforces the loop. Each repetition pushes every token in the span toward probability that Duan et al. study this in their work on circular reasoning. They link it to a “V-shaped” attention pattern. They find that semantic repetition precedes textual repetition. Mechanism 3: greedy sampling. Reasoning models usually run at low temperature for stable, reproducible traces. At temperature 0, the most likely token is always selected. A locally reinforced loop then has no exit. Liquid AI reports significant looping even at temp=0.67. Lower temperatures exacerbate the problem. How Antidoom Locates the Failure Antidoom generates completions on a prompt mix designed to elicit looping, at low temperature. That mix ships as the LiquidAI/antidoom-mix-v1.0 dataset. A loop is detected when a section repeats at least four times, over at least 60 characters. The method then targets the first token of the first repeat. At that position, it takes the base model’s top-k log-prob alternatives. It filters short or non-alphanumeric noise. It keeps up to 20 plausible substitutes as chosen tokens. Each training row is a tuple of prompt prefix, one rejected token, and one or more chosen tokens. The chosen and rejected distributions are regularised before training. Otherwise a few culprits like Wait, So, and the would dominate and over-suppression would degrade reasoning. The detection rule itself is simple to state in code. The snippet below is illustrative. Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser # A loop = a unit repeating >=4 times, spanning >=60 characters. # Returns the index of the first token of the first repeat (the target), else None. def find_loop(text, min_repeats=4, min_chars=60): n = len(text) for span in range(1, n // min_repeats + 1): start = 0 while start + span * min_repeats <= n: unit = text[start:start + span] repeats = 1 pos = start + span while text[pos:pos + span] == unit: repeats += 1 pos += span if repeats >= min_repeats and span * repeats >= min_chars: return start + span # first token of the first repeat start += 1 return None Each detected loop then becomes one training row. The structure is a simple tuple. Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser # One FTPO training row, per the post’s [prefix, rejected, chosen] format. row = { “prompt”: prefix_up_to_the_loop, # text before the first repeat “rejected”: ” Wait”, # the single token that started the loop “chosen”: [” So”, ” Since”, ” The”, ” Therefore”], # up to 20 alternatives } Final Token Preference Optimization (FTPO) FTPO is a preference-optimization algorithm similar to DPO. A training sample has a prompt, a chosen continuation, and a rejected continuation. It is built to change a handful of tokens, with minimal disturbance to the model otherwise. FTPO differs from DPO in four ways: Final token training: It trains only the trailing token of a sequence that is midway through generation. Multiple chosen tokens per sample: It spreads probability across a group of alternatives, so one overtrained token is not simply replaced by another. KL-like loss in logit space: It omits the softmax and computes divergence from reference in logits, avoiding pressure on unrelated tokens. Two-part regularization: Chosen and rejected logits move more freely, while the remaining vocab stays tightly constrained. In the Antidoom implementation, the model trains for one epoch with LoRA. High LoRA ranks of 128-256 gave the best results. Training covers all attention and MLP projections, plus lm_head. Learning rates land around 4e-6 to 2e-5. Training uses early stopping on chosen_win, the share of samples where chosen tokens beat rejected. Stopping at chosen_win=0.35 cut doom-loop rates from 20-30% down to 1-2%. Training longer tended to degrade the model. For the early LFM2.5-2.6B checkpoint, training-set generation took about one hour on 8x MI325 GPUs. Training then

Liquid AI Open-Sources Antidoom: A Final Token Preference Optimization (FTPO) Method that Reduces Doom Loops in Reasoning Models Read Post »

We use cookies to improve your experience and performance on our website. You can learn more at 隱私權政策 and manage your privacy settings by clicking Settings.

Privacy Preferences

You can choose your cookie settings by turning on/off each type of cookie as you wish, except for essential cookies.

Allow All
Manage Consent Preferences
  • Always Active

Save
zh_CN