In a research station in central Panama, you can walk through a century of forest time, watching scrubby plots of adolescent trees give way to cathedral-\u00adlike canopies of mature growth. Forest ecologist Daisy Dent, a senior scientist at ETH Zurich, oversees this sequence of plots across the Barro Colorado Nature Monument, some of which date as far back as the 19th century. Not one of the trees she surveys was planted by human hands. She maps, measures, and tracks each trunk that emerges, revealing how waves of tree life rise from bare earth.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Tropical forests like these are our planet\u2019s biggest terrestrial carbon sink, accounting for around 40% of carbon stored on land<\/a>. As part of an international network of researchers, Dent is deciphering the networks of animal and plant interactions that enable some forests to recover after destruction. The goal is a low-cost, high-impact alternative to typical carbon-\u00adcrediting schemes, which plant huge areas with a single species of tree. For over a decade, her research has built a body of evidence that such large \u201cmonocrop\u201d programs could be expensive mistakes\u2014and that more resilient forests can rebound naturally in just a few decades, re-creating ecosystems that suck up vast quantities of carbon dioxide.\u00a0<\/p>\n Few places are better to demonstrate this than Barro Colorado, a reserve covering the forested peninsulas and islands that formed when construction of the Panama Canal flooded the area in 1914. Under the management of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, generations of ecologists have amassed more than a century of records.\u00a0<\/p>\n That means Dent can trace why some plots rebound after clear-cutting for farming and forestry while others falter. Fruit-eating animals\u2014including spider monkeys, bats, and parrots\u2014are responsible for planting more than 70% of trees<\/a> in tropical forests, and Dent\u2019s dataset can tell which built each patch of trees by depositing seeds in their nutrient-rich droppings. Many of these creatures worked together to plant a diverse 70-year-old patch whose canopy is approaching the stunning structure and richness of an ancient jungle. In contrast, a patch of similar age populated by narrow trunks of a single long-lived species, Gustavia superba<\/em>, hints that tropical rodents called agoutis are more or less the sole animal architects behind this more homogeneous forest.\u00a0<\/p>\n The data she collects helps write a playbook for when to let ecosystems regenerate and when to give them a helping hand. One 2024 estimate<\/a> in Nature<\/em> found that some 215\u2009million hectares of forest worldwide (an area larger than Mexico) could regenerate naturally. \u201cTropical forests are underpinned by this massive network of interactions,\u201d Dent says\u2014interactions between life-forms like the fungi that help trees take up nutrients, as well as pollinators and seed-distributors. Supporting those relationships is key to growing forests that lock up carbon and help sustain local communities and wildlife.\u00a0<\/p>\n Just over a decade ago, as the landmark Paris Agreement was being codified in 2015, forest recovery seized global attention as a solution to the climate crisis. Global leaders rallied behind plans to regrow a trillion trees<\/a>, after the ecologist Thomas Crowther highlighted their potential to capture a decade\u2019s worth of global carbon emissions. But the biggest question has lingered: How, exactly, do you regrow two trees for every star in the Milky Way?<\/p>\n While startups have proposed seed-spraying drones<\/a> and nutrient-coated seed bombs<\/a>, Dent has spent two decades studying what happens when we let forests rebuild themselves. As a PhD student around the turn of the millennium, she researched old-growth forests in northern Borneo but felt hopeless watching entire landscapes felled for palm oil plantations. Rather than despair, she turned to restoration. Then, as a postdoc in 2005, she joined Panama\u2019s Prorena, a joint initiative between the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, which aimed at determining how best to establish diverse native forests on clear-cut land.<\/p>\n Back then, secondary forests\u2014ones that grow naturally after the original forest was lost\u2014had been \u201ca bit of a niche research area,\u201d Dent says. But as farming and human infrastructure have driven deforestation, resurgent forests now account for some 70% of all tropical canopies. Prorena initially followed the usual playbook of transplanting nursery trees to rangelands, but Dent began to question whether planting was necessary. In 2009, she published an encouraging paper<\/a> showing that animal populations rebound quickly as forests naturally regrow.<\/p>\n In 2010, she began working in Barro Colorado on the plots established by the pioneering American ecologist Julie Denslow. In 1994, Denslow identified plots that had been regenerating naturally for 20 to 100 years, and Dent would add younger ones to continue the sequence.\u00a0<\/p>\n The site provides not just general data on forest regrowth but in-depth demographic information over time, says Robin Chazdon, a professor emeritus of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Connecticut who collaborated with Denslow when she established the plots. \u201cIt tells you more about the actual processes that are happening in the site,\u201d she says.\u00a0<\/p>\n For example, previous research had shown that fast-growing \u201cpioneer trees,\u201d the first to thrive in the damaged land, are eventually overtaken by larger carbon-storing trees. Dent\u2019s research helped fill in gaps about the mechanics of how this happens\u2014or doesn\u2019t happen\u2014in individual cases. In the Gustavia<\/em>-dominated patch, for instance, stubborn grasses planted by cattle ranchers smothered most other trees before they could take root. These trees can hang around, crowding out the light, for 150 years, blocking the second wave of large-trunked trees.\u00a0<\/p>\n Dent found herself well placed for the massive influx of interest in reforestation that began in 2015. She\u2019d already become a principal investigator for 2ndFor, an international research network aiming to learn how best to manage secondary forests. Using data gathered from the Barro Colorado plots, the team authored a 2016 paper<\/a> in Nature <\/em>showing that a hectare of naturally regenerated secondary forest can capture 11 times as much carbon each year as an old-growth one, with young trees absorbing it quickly as they compete to grow toward the sun.\u00a0<\/p>\n Then, in a 2022 study<\/a> published by the Royal Society, Dent and colleagues showed that locations such as Barro Colorado are among the best-case scenarios for what can be achieved without planting a single seed. Clearings are often surrounded by lush environments filled with birds, bats, and other animals, all of which help tree cover regain old-growth levels of richness and abundance within a few decades. Using data from Panama and Brazil, Dent published a follow-up in 2024 showing that plots with as little as 35% of tree cover<\/a> can regenerate as forest.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cHaving these long-term mapped forest plots is really valuable,\u201d says Liza Comita, a professor of tropical forest ecology at Yale University, who is collaborating with Dent on projects that translate her findings into action. \u201cIt provides this really nice research infrastructure where you can build projects on top of that.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n In Panama, Dent works with nonprofits and carbon-crediting schemes to fast-track recovery. They\u2019ve mapped corridors to reconnect forest fragments and made plans to reintroduce animals in \u201csilent forests\u201d that have lost much of their wildlife. They\u2019re also working to replant tree species that can accelerate growth\u2014what Comita calls assisted natural regeneration. Leaving plots alone may seem like the simpler option, but it can\u2019t be done everywhere, says Dent. Many sites are too degraded.\u00a0<\/p>\n Clearings are often surrounded by lush environments filled with birds, bats, and other animals, all of which helps tree cover regain old-growth \u00adlevels of richness.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n The two are working with the London-based carbon-crediting startup Ponterra to develop solutions for a region of southern Panama where remnant forests line the edges of abandoned ranches. Such sites almost always need some intervention, Comita explains. Many demand hands-on actions, such as enrichment planting.\u00a0<\/p>\n Today, the questions projects like Ponterra are asking are closer to her own research, says Dent. For instance, they want to understand if solitary standing trees, often left by ranchers to shade cows, help sites regenerate faster. Those insights can help Ponterra sell high-quality credits and avoid the embarrassing pitfalls that can lead fresh plantations to literally go up in smoke. While credits can be bought for as little as $5 per metric ton, corporate giants such as Microsoft\u2014one of Ponterra\u2019s clients\u2014have paid more than 10 times as much for high-quality removal.<\/p>\n There are plenty of places where a level of natural regeneration can work well. So far, millions of hectares of rainforest are naturally regenerating in Brazil, according to the Brazilian Restoration and Reforestation Observatory. Still, Dent is mystified as to why the people in charge of large-scale projects continue to think the best solution is the one that imposes humans\u2019 will on the landscape.\u00a0<\/p>\n The conversation may be shifting. As droughts hit Latin America, policymakers and carbon creditors might be forced to face the shortcomings of cookie-cutter plantations. \u201cYou have much reduced resilience in the system when it comes to extreme events like droughts or floods or extreme heat or pathogens,\u201d Dent says. The coming year\u2019s \u201cmega El Ni\u00f1o\u201d could be a moment of reckoning, she says: \u201cI think there\u2019s an increasing recognition that we can\u2019t just plant trees. We have to rebuild a system.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n Matthew Ponsford is a freelance reporter based in London.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In a research station in central Panama, you can walk through a century of forest time, watching scrubby plots of adolescent trees give way to cathedral-\u00adlike canopies of mature growth. Forest ecologist Daisy Dent, a senior scientist at ETH Zurich, oversees this sequence of plots across the Barro Colorado Nature Monument, some of which date as far back as the 19th century. Not one of the trees she surveys was planted by human hands. She maps, measures, and tracks each trunk that emerges, revealing how waves of tree life rise from bare earth.\u00a0 Tropical forests like these are our planet\u2019s biggest terrestrial carbon sink, accounting for around 40% of carbon stored on land. As part of an international network of researchers, Dent is deciphering the networks of animal and plant interactions that enable some forests to recover after destruction. The goal is a low-cost, high-impact alternative to typical carbon-\u00adcrediting schemes, which plant huge areas with a single species of tree. For over a decade, her research has built a body of evidence that such large \u201cmonocrop\u201d programs could be expensive mistakes\u2014and that more resilient forests can rebound naturally in just a few decades, re-creating ecosystems that suck up vast quantities of carbon dioxide.\u00a0 Few places are better to demonstrate this than Barro Colorado, a reserve covering the forested peninsulas and islands that formed when construction of the Panama Canal flooded the area in 1914. Under the management of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, generations of ecologists have amassed more than a century of records.\u00a0 That means Dent can trace why some plots rebound after clear-cutting for farming and forestry while others falter. Fruit-eating animals\u2014including spider monkeys, bats, and parrots\u2014are responsible for planting more than 70% of trees in tropical forests, and Dent\u2019s dataset can tell which built each patch of trees by depositing seeds in their nutrient-rich droppings. Many of these creatures worked together to plant a diverse 70-year-old patch whose canopy is approaching the stunning structure and richness of an ancient jungle. In contrast, a patch of similar age populated by narrow trunks of a single long-lived species, Gustavia superba, hints that tropical rodents called agoutis are more or less the sole animal architects behind this more homogeneous forest.\u00a0 The data she collects helps write a playbook for when to let ecosystems regenerate and when to give them a helping hand. One 2024 estimate in Nature found that some 215\u2009million hectares of forest worldwide (an area larger than Mexico) could regenerate naturally. \u201cTropical forests are underpinned by this massive network of interactions,\u201d Dent says\u2014interactions between life-forms like the fungi that help trees take up nutrients, as well as pollinators and seed-distributors. Supporting those relationships is key to growing forests that lock up carbon and help sustain local communities and wildlife.\u00a0 Filling in the gaps Just over a decade ago, as the landmark Paris Agreement was being codified in 2015, forest recovery seized global attention as a solution to the climate crisis. Global leaders rallied behind plans to regrow a trillion trees, after the ecologist Thomas Crowther highlighted their potential to capture a decade\u2019s worth of global carbon emissions. But the biggest question has lingered: How, exactly, do you regrow two trees for every star in the Milky Way? While startups have proposed seed-spraying drones and nutrient-coated seed bombs, Dent has spent two decades studying what happens when we let forests rebuild themselves. As a PhD student around the turn of the millennium, she researched old-growth forests in northern Borneo but felt hopeless watching entire landscapes felled for palm oil plantations. Rather than despair, she turned to restoration. Then, as a postdoc in 2005, she joined Panama\u2019s Prorena, a joint initiative between the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, which aimed at determining how best to establish diverse native forests on clear-cut land. Back then, secondary forests\u2014ones that grow naturally after the original forest was lost\u2014had been \u201ca bit of a niche research area,\u201d Dent says. But as farming and human infrastructure have driven deforestation, resurgent forests now account for some 70% of all tropical canopies. Prorena initially followed the usual playbook of transplanting nursery trees to rangelands, but Dent began to question whether planting was necessary. In 2009, she published an encouraging paper showing that animal populations rebound quickly as forests naturally regrow. In 2010, she began working in Barro Colorado on the plots established by the pioneering American ecologist Julie Denslow. In 1994, Denslow identified plots that had been regenerating naturally for 20 to 100 years, and Dent would add younger ones to continue the sequence.\u00a0 The site provides not just general data on forest regrowth but in-depth demographic information over time, says Robin Chazdon, a professor emeritus of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Connecticut who collaborated with Denslow when she established the plots. \u201cIt tells you more about the actual processes that are happening in the site,\u201d she says.\u00a0 For example, previous research had shown that fast-growing \u201cpioneer trees,\u201d the first to thrive in the damaged land, are eventually overtaken by larger carbon-storing trees. Dent\u2019s research helped fill in gaps about the mechanics of how this happens\u2014or doesn\u2019t happen\u2014in individual cases. In the Gustavia-dominated patch, for instance, stubborn grasses planted by cattle ranchers smothered most other trees before they could take root. These trees can hang around, crowding out the light, for 150 years, blocking the second wave of large-trunked trees.\u00a0 To plant or not to plant Dent found herself well placed for the massive influx of interest in reforestation that began in 2015. She\u2019d already become a principal investigator for 2ndFor, an international research network aiming to learn how best to manage secondary forests. Using data gathered from the Barro Colorado plots, the team authored a 2016 paper in Nature showing that a hectare of naturally regenerated secondary forest can capture 11 times as much carbon each year as an old-growth one, with young trees absorbing it quickly as they compete to grow toward the<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"pmpro_default_level":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_pvb_checkbox_block_on_post":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[52,5,7,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124214","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ai-club","category-committee","category-news","category-uncategorized","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nFilling in the gaps<\/h3>\n
To plant or not to plant<\/h3>\n
\n