Artificial intelligence may have captured the public imagination through chatbots and image generators, but some of its most consequential use cases are unfolding far from consumer-facing tools. In industries where physical infrastructure, operational continuity, and safety are paramount, AI is becoming a core operating layer. With its sprawling industrial systems and constant stream of operational data, the energy sector offers a glimpse into what that future could look like.<\/p>\n
At Woodside Energy, AI adoption did not begin with generative models or enterprise copilots. The company has spent years building predictive analytics, optimization systems, and machine learning tools across exploration, drilling, maintenance, and plant operations. \u201cWe\u2019ve always had very large volumes of operational data coming from the equipment and the plants and the assets that we operate,\u201d says the company\u2019s vice president for digital Andrew Melouney. \u201cThose have created really clear, quite high-value use cases for us.\u201d<\/p>\n
That long-term investment in infrastructure and governance is now enabling a broader shift toward agentic AI systems that can support complex industrial workflows. Rather than replace<\/a> human operators, Woodside designs AI systems to augment expertise in high-stakes environments. A prime example is its \u201cStartup Advisor,\u201d an AI copilot that helps operators manage the complex process of starting liquefied natural gas (LNG) plants. \u201cWe\u2019re really thinking about, how does it support the people in the organization in terms of empowering them to make better decisions, to make faster decisions,\u201d Melouney explains.<\/p>\n The company\u2019s approach reflects a wider evolution taking place across industrial AI: graduating from isolated experiments to enterprise-wide systems built on standardized platforms, governed data, and repeatable deployment patterns. That transition, Melouney argues, requires organizations to rethink both their technology stacks and how work itself gets done. \u201cWe\u2019re not just bolting AI onto an existing process,\u201d he says. \u201cWe\u2019re deeply thinking about how that work needs to be reimagined.\u201d<\/p>\n Melouney\u2019s motto has become: \u201cThink big, prototype small, and scale fast.\u201d<\/p>\n As AI systems become more autonomous and interconnected, the companies poised to succeed may be those that spent years building the operational foundations beneath the hype.<\/p>\n \u201cOur ambition is really for an autonomous enterprise, where we have agents with agency that are able to really deeply interact with our core workflows,\u201d says Melouney.<\/p>\n This episode of Business Lab is produced in partnership with Infosys.<\/em><\/p>\n Full Transcript:<\/strong><\/p>\n Megan Tatum:<\/em> From MIT Technology Review, I\u2019m Megan Tatum, and this is Business Lab, the show that helps business leaders make sense of new technologies coming out of the lab and into the marketplace.<\/p>\n This episode is produced in partnership with Infosys.<\/p>\n Now, when people think about artificial intelligence, they often picture chatbots or productivity tools, but some of the most sophisticated and high impact uses of AI are actually happening far from consumer apps, inside complex industrial environments where safety, reliability, and physical systems matter. The global energy sector is a prime example.<\/p>\n Companies like Woodside Energy, a global energy producer headquartered in Western Australia, have been applying AI for more than a decade now, from advanced analytics and operations, to remote decision support, to smarter maintenance, and energy efficiency across large scale assets. Today, Woodside is scaling that experience, embedding AI more deeply across its operations and the enterprise with a strong focus on governance, data quality, and human accountability.<\/p>\n Two words for you: technological fuel.<\/p>\n My guest today is Andrew Melouney, vice president for digital at Woodside Energy. Welcome, Andrew.<\/p>\n Andrew Melouney:<\/em> Thanks, Megan. It\u2019s great to be here.<\/p>\n Megan: <\/em>Lovely to have you. Now, Andrew, as I said there, the energy sector has approached AI quite differently from technology or consumer businesses. Early value has emerged in operational and industrial environments, rather than consumer-facing generative AI tools. Why is that? And what differentiates the energy sector\u2019s AI journey?<\/p>\n Andrew:<\/em> Megan, I think it really comes down to the nature of the work we do. Energy operations and what Woodside does is very asset intensive, it\u2019s very safety critical, and it\u2019s highly physical. And when you think about how Woodside operates, we operate across the full value chain. We do exploration through to drilling and subsurface work, to project development, all the way through to operating assets, which are often operated in harsh and remote locations, and then global energy portfolio marketing and trading as well.<\/p>\n We\u2019ve always had very large volumes of operational data coming from the equipment and the plants and the assets that we operate, and those have created really clear, quite high-value use cases for us. When you think about reliability, when you think about safety and efficiency, those are really critical things for a company like Woodside. We\u2019ve been doing traditional AI for many years now. If you think about analytics, if you think about optimization, if you think about things like predictive models, those techniques we\u2019ve been applying to our data sets and to our business since around 2015.<\/p>\n And more recently with the advent of generative AI, we\u2019ve really found that we\u2019ve got a pretty strong and awesome foundation to build on top of and to really solve problems in the service of improving the business. And again, whether that is keeping people safe, keeping the environments we operate in safe, or improving returns for the organization.<\/p>\n Megan: <\/em>Fantastic. I mean you touched on it there, but how has this reality shaped your own AI strategy at Woodside? Where did you start, and where did the technology prove most impactful in those early days?<\/p>\n Andrew: <\/em>Well, like I said, we\u2019ve had a very long journey, in terms of understanding our operational data, recognizing the value of it, and collecting it at scale so that we can use it. And we\u2019ve been very deliberate in that approach, Megan. We\u2019ve really thought about where the value is and where the risks were manageable. And we\u2019ve started looking at, in today\u2019s world from an agentic AI perspective, we\u2019ve started looking at the problems that were solved with traditional AI and machine learning and data science in the past. And we\u2019ve started to think about, where can we then layer agentic AI over the top to provide an even better outcome?<\/p>\n For our asset intensive industry and organization, we\u2019re looking at areas such as maintenance optimization. We\u2019re looking at areas such as, how do we ensure our LNG plants start up reliably, consistently, and safely? And we\u2019re considering really our frontline workforce and making sure that we\u2019re giving people on the frontline the tools required to do their jobs. When we think about AI, we\u2019re really thinking about, how does it support the people in the organization in terms of empowering them to make better decisions, to make faster decisions? I think over time, this has just evolved from what has been traditional analytics to now artificial intelligence and generative AI. And we\u2019ve learned along the way that the technology is important, but it\u2019s about aligning people, processes, and the technology together.<\/p>\n We\u2019ve spent a long time not only in collecting the data and having a well-curated data set that we can build on top of, but we\u2019ve also spent a lot of time teaching people how to work in agile ways, how to do design thinking, how to problem solve, and how to really make sure that the technology that, say, my team can bring to bear to the organization is adopted effectively and purposefully. And I think once we had that solid foundation in place from a technology perspective, from a data perspective, once we got strong trust built between our digital teams and the organization, we really saw quite a material uptick and the scaling of technology occur more broadly across the enterprise.<\/p>\n Megan:<\/em> Fantastic. That people piece so important, isn\u2019t it? It\u2019s just a tool, technology, that needs to be in the right hands. And you touched on data there; industrial AI obviously depends on vast amounts of data. Can you walk us through how you\u2019ve approached data at Woodside in a little more detail? How it\u2019s structured and governed, and how tools like maintenance intelligence as well fit into that.<\/p>\n Andrew: <\/em>Well, data is really foundational and fundamental to everything we do, particularly from a technology perspective. It gives us the ability to innovate at pace<\/a> when we are building over the top of a strong foundation. As I said before, we\u2019ve had the benefit of a long-term investment in our underlying operational data. I think the way we think about data is that it\u2019s an asset for us.<\/p>\n And when you think about operating a facility where you\u2019ve got sensors everywhere, you\u2019ve got data streaming in real time, you\u2019ve got operators needing to make decisions in real time, we have consciously made a decision over many, many years to invest in that enterprise scale data platform to make sure that it\u2019s secure. We\u2019ve got well-structured data assets, and we\u2019ve got strong governance over the top of that data so that when it is used, when it\u2019s built in a data science application or an AI agent, that we\u2019ve got a level of trust in it that it\u2019s going to be used responsibly. And that when it\u2019s used, it can be trusted to give the outcome that we expect.<\/p>\n We have developed platforms that continuously ingest really high frequency data from the assets and from our enterprise systems. Once we\u2019ve been able to develop solutions on top of that, parts of the business that might own the systems that collect that data, they see the value in it.<\/p>\n When you look at something like maintenance<\/a> intelligence is a really good example of how we\u2019ve been able to take something that we\u2019ve been working on for a long time. Woodside does a lot of maintenance, it\u2019s a very important part of our business, and it occurs across all of our operating assets. But we have been looking at how we do predictive analytics and predictive maintenance for a long time across that data set that we own. And something like maintenance intelligence is a solution that gives us the ability to optimize how we do that maintenance. And what it does is it analyzes<\/a> historical maintenance records, alongside the performance of the equipment. And again, by having that data set well-governed and in one place, we get the ability to correlate different data sets, such as maintenance records out of SAP, alongside say equipment and performance coming from our time series data lake.<\/p>\n And when we build over the top of that, something like maintenance intelligence gives us the opportunity to recommend to the assets what the optimal timing for maintenance activities might be, and really give what is quite a simple aim, which is do the right work at the right time. And with something like maintenance intelligence, we have seen the opportunity, and we have the opportunity to reduce maintenance hours by up to 15% over five years on one of the assets that we\u2019ve piloted this on. And as we\u2019ve built out that underlying analytical model, we\u2019re now able to put agentic AI over the top of that and provide better insights and optimize that solution more.<\/p>\n It really comes down to providing our asset teams and our operational teams with the right decision support capability that ensures they\u2019re still accountable to make the decision and to ensure the right work is being done, but we are giving them the best possible opportunity to use their judgment and experience with the data that we provide to make the right decision.<\/p>\n Megan: <\/em>Sounds like a really impactful change. Last year also marked a milestone in moving from early AI learnings to scale, using AI more deliberately as a force multiplier. What transition were you trying to make and how did you approach it?<\/p>\n Andrew: <\/em>Well, Megan, we\u2019ve had a philosophy for a long time in Woodside from an innovation perspective, where we really want to think big, we want to prototype small, and we want to scale fast. We want to find big opportunities that we can go after, but we want to ensure that we look at how we deploy those on a small scale first, and then provide the right learning and insight that then can scale it everywhere. Something like maintenance intelligence is a good example of that, or our Startup Advisor, where we know that we\u2019ve got multiple plants that we need to start up. We know that we\u2019ve got multiple assets that need to do maintenance, so we have a big, bold ambition about how we can improve and optimize that. We start with a small prototype; it might be one subsystem, it might be just a part of an asset, and then we scale it out, we learn, and we scale faster.<\/p>\n I think from an AI learning perspective, one of the key things we\u2019ve learned is really the transition from moving from isolated AI solutions to a more coordinated enterprise-wide capability. If you look back maybe 18 months, two years, in our generative AI journey, we rarely started by deploying AI as broadly as we could in the organization from a personal productivity perspective. And probably being quite open in terms of the problems that we will solve, the business problems that we\u2019ll solve with AI. That had a lot of benefits for us in terms of allowing our organization to get to know AI, get to know the capabilities, to build the trust in it.<\/p>\n What we\u2019ve learned though is that we\u2019ve needed to pivot from that to being a little bit tighter in terms of where we are going to invest our time and resources and more higher value solutions. How do we then enable and empower the rest of the organization so that they can actually effectively problem solve with technology in their domain or in their personal productivity without having to come to a central team?<\/p>\n When we think about that, think big, prototype small, scale fast, has been something really important for us. The transition from a more broader approach to use case development and solution development to now a narrower focus on the high value priorities. We\u2019ve seen that paying dividends to us and allowing us to go after solutions and opportunities, things like Startup Advisor.<\/p>\n And so our Startup Advisor is a agentic AI solution that really aims to optimize and empower and better support our operators that sit in front of a panel and have to start up LNG plants, which are incredibly technical facilities and require really specialist skills to start up. And so our Startup Advisor is almost like a copilot that sits alongside those operators, and it gives them the ability to be able to play back previous startups. It gives them the ability to look at how the current startup is progressing, and it provides them better insights to optimize how they start up that facility. And again, starting up an LNG facility is incredibly complex.<\/p>\n Megan: <\/em>I can imagine.<\/p>\n Andrew:<\/em> When we think about opportunities like Startup Advisor, again, it goes back to that think big, prototype small, and scale fast. We started with a very bold vision of, how do we start up all of our LNG plants in a much more structured and optimized fashion? How do we better support our panel operators? How do we make, say, a more junior panel operator have a copilot that can help them almost like an experienced panel operator sitting next to them? And when we think about that vision and the ability then to prototype on a small scale and then scale fast, I think it\u2019s been really successful for us.<\/p>\n As we scale, we\u2019ve just naturally expanded into more agent-based solutions. Today, we\u2019ve got around 50 AI agents in production, supporting both our operating assets and our enterprise workflows. These tools have been proven in live environments, and we have really seen the benefit of being able to shift from point solutions that maybe solve small scale problems in specific areas, to AI and agentic solutions with agency that can really work across our workflows.<\/p>\n We\u2019re able to do this because we\u2019ve standardized on the platform that we build on and we\u2019ve got repeatable patterns. That\u2019s been another really important learning for us, is that we don\u2019t want to build 50 solutions in 50 different ways. We really want to be empowering our organization and our technical teams and the users of our solutions to roll them out quickly, to roll them out safely, and to do it in a patternized and platform manner.<\/p>\n But the last point I\u2019ll make, Megan, from a learning perspective is that we\u2019ve really understood that a strong governance around how AI is deployed and developed is critical for us, and it\u2019s critical for us to go fast as well. The traditional ways of governing how we roll out different solutions or digital systems isn\u2019t going to scale to the breadth that we need when we are thinking about AI. Being able to have a clear philosophy around how we innovate, transitioning from isolated solutions to that enterprise-wide capability, and making sure that we\u2019ve got strong platforms with strong patterns and clear governance are the three really critical things that we\u2019ve learned.<\/p>\n Megan: <\/em>Such important pillars, all of them. And you\u2019ve been working with Infosys on this journey. How has that partnership helped accelerate scaling and embedding AI across the business?<\/p>\n Andrew: <\/em>Well, Infosys is our managed service provider, and so they play a really critical role in the operations of our core business. One of the things that I like to say is that our license to innovate is based on our license to operate. And so, for my team to be able to turn up to an operating asset or a corporate function and have the trust that\u2019s needed to be able to innovate and reimagine and redesign how work gets done, to be able to do that, we need to make sure that our core platforms, our core systems, our applications are running really reliably, safely, and consistently every day. Having an experienced partner like Infosys looking after those core operations in partnership with our internal teams is really, really important to us.<\/p>\n As we move from pilots to enterprise-wide deployment, the ability to partner with someone like Infosys also gives us the ability to scale. And so being from Perth and Western Australia, while we\u2019ve got a really strong local team in Western Australia, and we\u2019ve also got a very strong team in some of our other operating locations, like everyone, we\u2019re struggling to find people that can fill AI roles. Being able to partner with Infosys and have a number of different operating models at our disposal becomes really important for us. Having co-mingled teams where they are staff, they are Infosys staff, Woodside staff, and some of our other partners, really just brings diversity of thought and experience to how we solve problems.<\/p>\n Fundamentally, the partnership has allowed us to operate and innovate with more confidence. While Woodside always retains ownership of the strategy and where we\u2019re going and the governance and my teams remain accountable for the outcomes, we can\u2019t do what we do without strong partnerships like the one we have with Infosys.<\/p>\n Megan: <\/em>Fantastic. And as AI adoption scales, you mentioned yourself, governance becomes increasingly important. How challenging has that been, and what guardrails have you put in place at Woodside?<\/p>\n Andrew:<\/em> So, Megan, governance is really important to us, and we operate in a well-regulated environment. That means we\u2019ve got to make really deliberate and well-reasoned decisions when we\u2019re thinking about how we deploy technology into our organization, whether it\u2019s artificial intelligence or anything else, for that matter. And so, governance is really central to how we approach the execution of our AI strategy at Woodside.<\/p>\n We\u2019ve got maybe two or three really key things that we\u2019ve put in place. The first one is just making sure that every AI use case goes through a structured assessment, and that\u2019s making sure it meets our privacy controls, our cyber controls. We\u2019re also asking the question, not just, could we do this, but should we do this? We\u2019ve really got to bring together safety, ethics, transparency, accountability, and make sure that we make an informed decision. When an AI solution is going through that structured assessment, if there are concerns about how we might use that solution, it then goes to an AI council that\u2019s made up of senior leaders across the organization. That council and that group really oversee some of the prioritization and risk management. That\u2019s where we can have really strong, robust debates around, again, could we do something, should we do it, and how do we mitigate any of the risks that we might introduce here?<\/p>\n I think the last one, Megan, is really around lifecycle management. When you start thinking about, we\u2019ve got 50 at the moment, but if we had 500 agents working in our organization, really amplifying the experience and the decision-making and the value creation of our staff, we really want to have an ability to manage the lifecycle of how those agents operate. We want to know, how many people are using them? What\u2019s the efficacy and the outcome? Is there model drift? Do we need to retune or retrain? I think that\u2019s an area where many organizations, including Woodside, are still leaning into and still figuring out the best way to do this. We can do it quite easily with 50 agents, but 500, 5,000, 50,000 becomes an opportunity for us. Again, thinking about how we partner with others, solving problems like that really present an opportunity to co-create and to co-solve with some of our partners, like with Infosys.<\/p>\n Megan:<\/em> Fantastic. Just to close, what\u2019s your long-term vision for AI at Woodside? How do you see this evolving over the years ahead, and what could it unlock for the sector in your view?<\/p>\n Andrew: <\/em>So Megan, I think our ambition is really for an autonomous enterprise, where we have agents with agency that are able to really deeply interact with our core workflows. The outcome that we want to get from that is to protect our people, to protect the environments we operate in, and to be able to provide energy at a lower cost to the world. When we think about that ambition, we can really see that being applied to almost all of the areas that Woodside work in. Whether that\u2019s from exploration through to project developments, through to operations or marketing, the scale of the opportunity in front of us and the ability for us to really change the way that work flows through the organization is really exciting.<\/p>\n For us, there\u2019s three things that we have to get right in terms of being able to execute on that ambition. The first one is really thinking about how the work gets done in the organization so that we\u2019re not just bolting AI onto an existing process, but we\u2019re deeply thinking about how that work needs to be reimagined. We\u2019ve also got to think about how we enable our workforce to work differently. Providing them with the skills and the tools and the ability to really harness the power of the technology that we provide.<\/p>\n Secondly, we\u2019ve got to continue to move from and restrain ourselves from deploying point solutions that solve very narrow problems, to having more connected, agentic systems of systems that can interact with each other. To do that, and if we do that successfully, that\u2019s where we really get the high value unlock from agents being able to interact with workflows and really change how the work gets done.<\/p>\n And lastly, Megan, it\u2019s about how we must continue our philosophy of thinking big, prototyping small, and scaling fast.<\/p>\n Megan: <\/em>Which is a fantastic lens to which to make all these decisions. Thank you so much, Andrew. That was Andrew Melouney, vice president for digital at Woodside Energy, whom I spoke with from Brighton in England.<\/p>\n That\u2019s it for this episode of Business Lab. I\u2019m your host, Megan Tatum. I\u2019m a contributing editor and host for Insights, the custom publishing division of MIT Technology Review. We were founded in 1899 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and you can find us in print, on the web, and at events each year around the world. For more information about us and the show, please check out our website at technologyreview.com.<\/p>\n This show is available wherever you get your podcasts. And if you enjoyed this episode, we hope you\u2019ll take a moment to rate and review us. Business Lab is a production of MIT Technology Review, and this episode was produced by Giro Studios. Thanks ever so much for listening. Goodbye.<\/p>\n This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Review\u2019s editorial staff. It was researched, designed, and written by human writers, editors, analysts, and illustrators. This includes the writing of surveys and collection of data for surveys. AI tools that may have been used were limited to secondary production processes that passed thorough human review.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Artificial intelligence may have captured the public imagination through chatbots and image generators, but some of its most consequential use cases are unfolding far from consumer-facing tools. In industries where physical infrastructure, operational continuity, and safety are paramount, AI is becoming a core operating layer. With its sprawling industrial systems and constant stream of operational data, the energy sector offers a glimpse into what that future could look like. At Woodside Energy, AI adoption did not begin with generative models or enterprise copilots. The company has spent years building predictive analytics, optimization systems, and machine learning tools across exploration, drilling, maintenance, and plant operations. \u201cWe\u2019ve always had very large volumes of operational data coming from the equipment and the plants and the assets that we operate,\u201d says the company\u2019s vice president for digital Andrew Melouney. \u201cThose have created really clear, quite high-value use cases for us.\u201d That long-term investment in infrastructure and governance is now enabling a broader shift toward agentic AI systems that can support complex industrial workflows. Rather than replace human operators, Woodside designs AI systems to augment expertise in high-stakes environments. A prime example is its \u201cStartup Advisor,\u201d an AI copilot that helps operators manage the complex process of starting liquefied natural gas (LNG) plants. \u201cWe\u2019re really thinking about, how does it support the people in the organization in terms of empowering them to make better decisions, to make faster decisions,\u201d Melouney explains. The company\u2019s approach reflects a wider evolution taking place across industrial AI: graduating from isolated experiments to enterprise-wide systems built on standardized platforms, governed data, and repeatable deployment patterns. That transition, Melouney argues, requires organizations to rethink both their technology stacks and how work itself gets done. \u201cWe\u2019re not just bolting AI onto an existing process,\u201d he says. \u201cWe\u2019re deeply thinking about how that work needs to be reimagined.\u201d Melouney\u2019s motto has become: \u201cThink big, prototype small, and scale fast.\u201d As AI systems become more autonomous and interconnected, the companies poised to succeed may be those that spent years building the operational foundations beneath the hype. \u201cOur ambition is really for an autonomous enterprise, where we have agents with agency that are able to really deeply interact with our core workflows,\u201d says Melouney. This episode of Business Lab is produced in partnership with Infosys. Full Transcript: Megan Tatum: From MIT Technology Review, I\u2019m Megan Tatum, and this is Business Lab, the show that helps business leaders make sense of new technologies coming out of the lab and into the marketplace. This episode is produced in partnership with Infosys. Now, when people think about artificial intelligence, they often picture chatbots or productivity tools, but some of the most sophisticated and high impact uses of AI are actually happening far from consumer apps, inside complex industrial environments where safety, reliability, and physical systems matter. The global energy sector is a prime example. Companies like Woodside Energy, a global energy producer headquartered in Western Australia, have been applying AI for more than a decade now, from advanced analytics and operations, to remote decision support, to smarter maintenance, and energy efficiency across large scale assets. Today, Woodside is scaling that experience, embedding AI more deeply across its operations and the enterprise with a strong focus on governance, data quality, and human accountability. Two words for you: technological fuel. My guest today is Andrew Melouney, vice president for digital at Woodside Energy. Welcome, Andrew. Andrew Melouney: Thanks, Megan. It\u2019s great to be here. Megan: Lovely to have you. Now, Andrew, as I said there, the energy sector has approached AI quite differently from technology or consumer businesses. Early value has emerged in operational and industrial environments, rather than consumer-facing generative AI tools. Why is that? And what differentiates the energy sector\u2019s AI journey? Andrew: Megan, I think it really comes down to the nature of the work we do. Energy operations and what Woodside does is very asset intensive, it\u2019s very safety critical, and it\u2019s highly physical. And when you think about how Woodside operates, we operate across the full value chain. We do exploration through to drilling and subsurface work, to project development, all the way through to operating assets, which are often operated in harsh and remote locations, and then global energy portfolio marketing and trading as well. We\u2019ve always had very large volumes of operational data coming from the equipment and the plants and the assets that we operate, and those have created really clear, quite high-value use cases for us. When you think about reliability, when you think about safety and efficiency, those are really critical things for a company like Woodside. We\u2019ve been doing traditional AI for many years now. If you think about analytics, if you think about optimization, if you think about things like predictive models, those techniques we\u2019ve been applying to our data sets and to our business since around 2015. And more recently with the advent of generative AI, we\u2019ve really found that we\u2019ve got a pretty strong and awesome foundation to build on top of and to really solve problems in the service of improving the business. And again, whether that is keeping people safe, keeping the environments we operate in safe, or improving returns for the organization. Megan: Fantastic. I mean you touched on it there, but how has this reality shaped your own AI strategy at Woodside? Where did you start, and where did the technology prove most impactful in those early days? Andrew: Well, like I said, we\u2019ve had a very long journey, in terms of understanding our operational data, recognizing the value of it, and collecting it at scale so that we can use it. And we\u2019ve been very deliberate in that approach, Megan. We\u2019ve really thought about where the value is and where the risks were manageable. And we\u2019ve started looking at, in today\u2019s world from an agentic AI perspective, we\u2019ve started looking at the problems that were solved with traditional AI and machine learning and data science in the past. And we\u2019ve<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"pmpro_default_level":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_pvb_checkbox_block_on_post":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[52,5,7,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101437","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ai-club","category-committee","category-news","category-uncategorized","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n