YouZum

Uncategorized

AI, Committee, Actualités, Uncategorized

A new US phone network for Christians aims to block porn and gender-related content

A new US-wide cell phone network marketed to Christians is set to launch next week. It blocks porn, which experts in network security say marks the first time a US cell plan has used network-level blocking for such content that can’t be turned off even by adult account owners. It’s also rolling out a filter on sexual content aimed at blocking material related to gender and trans issues, which will be optional but turned on by default across all plans. The network, which is currently being tested ahead of its May 5 launch date, will be run by Radiant Mobile, a newly launched mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). These operators don’t own cell towers but buy bandwidth from the big providers (in this case, T-Mobile) and sell to specific demographics (President Trump announced his own MVNO last year called Trump Mobile; CREDOMobile sends donations to progressive causes).  “We are going to create—and we think we have every right to do so—an environment that is Jesus-centric, that is void of pornography, void of LGBT, void of trans,” Radiant Mobile’s founder, Paul Fisher, told MIT Technology Review. A representative for T-Mobile did not comment on whether these content blocks violate any of its policies. In a statement, the representative added that T-Mobile does not have a direct relationship with Radiant Mobile but instead works through the MVNO manager CompaxDigital.  Fisher says he’s recruited a mix of Christian influencers to advertise the plan and has also done outreach to thousands of churches around the country, offering a way to have Radiant donate a portion of congregants’ $30-per-month subscription fee to their church. Fisher has ambitions to market it beyond the US in other countries with significant Christian populations, like South Korea and Mexico. At least one piece of Radiant’s pitch will sound familiar: the idea that the internet is awash in toxic sludge. It’s powered by content and algorithms that are making us more sad, hateful, and detached. A number of efforts aim to fix that, including contentious age verification laws and a coming wave of lawsuits alleging that social media companies knowingly got young users hooked on their platforms.  Fisher is pursuing the nuclear option. He says Radiant is working with the Israeli cybersecurity company Allot to block categories of content, such as material about violence or self-harm. Some categories are banned by default and cannot be allowed even for adult users.  This includes pornography. Chris Klimis, a minister in Orlando who was recruited to be the company’s chief operating officer, says part of the reason he got involved was to offer Christians a real way to “do something” about what he sees as a pornography crisis in the faith. He was appalled by a recent survey showing that 67% of pastors have a “personal history” with porn use. And he worries his six children will come across porn on their devices, even if only inadvertently. “We’ve got to figure out some way to close the door to the digital space,” he says. “That’s what we’re trying to do.” The technology to do this blocking is a blunt instrument: Allot groups website domains into more than a hundred categories, which include pornography but also violence, malware, gaming, and in Radiant Mobile’s case “sects,” which includes websites about Satanism. If one of its users tries to visit a website that belongs to a blocked category, the page won’t load. That’s harsher than app-based content blockers like Covenant Eyes, a Christian porn-quitting app that sends notifications to your friends or family if you slip up; those can be worked around or deleted. “Blocking in the network is certainly not new,” says David Choffnes, a computer science professor and executive director of Northeastern University’s Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute. Such blocking is the backbone of censorship efforts by authoritarian governments, for example. But there are more benign ways it’s used too. US telecoms block particular domains known to be spreading malware and offer optional network-level controls to block adult content on kids’ phones. What is new is a US cell plan instituting network-level blocks that can’t be removed, even by adults. The trouble is that most websites don’t fit neatly into one category, leaving Fisher with enormous and subjective control over which are allowed or banned. This is most apparent in his effort to block content related to gender identity. Anthony Re, a sales director at Allot, says the company does not have a category specific to gender but that “LGBT content” tends to fall into its sexuality category, which is described on Radiant Mobile’s website as “sites that provide information on sex, sex and teenagers, and sexual education, without pornographic content.” This category is blocked by default for all phones, a setting that can be changed by adult account owners.  But if a news site starts hosting enough gender-related content, Fisher might not just label it as “press,” which is allowed, but also “sexuality,” thus blocking the whole domain to any phone with that category blocked.  Fisher illustrates the subjectivity of such decisions with a recent example involving Yale University. Its general website, www.yale.edu, is categorized by Allot as education. “But they have a subsection of one of their websites that’s totally focused on, you know, trans equality,” Fisher says, referring to lgbtq.yale.edu. Because it’s a distinct domain, Radiant Mobile is able to place it in the sexuality category and block it.  Yale’s main website remains unblocked, for now. “If we see [the LGBTQ content] on the front pages consistently of Yale University, we’ll block them too,” Fisher says. Managing website block lists is a professional pivot for Fisher, who spent his career not in telecoms but in fashion; he was an agent for supermodels like Naomi Campbell and members of the Hilton and Getty families, and he later hosted a reality show in which he found people in rehab facilities and homeless shelters and tried to turn them into models. He ultimately left the industry and now says he regrets the role he

A new US phone network for Christians aims to block porn and gender-related content Lire l’article »

AI, Committee, Actualités, Uncategorized

Inexpensive seafloor-hopping submersibles could stoke deep-sea science—and mining

Smack dab between Australia and South America, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) research vessel Rainier is currently on a mission to map more than 8,000 square nautical miles of the Pacific seafloor in search of critical mineral deposits. But it isn’t doing it alone; for a month starting this week, it will deploy two oblong neon submersibles as the project’s special agents, sending them nearly 6,000 meters down to hop along the seafloor.  The submersibles, built by the young company Orpheus Ocean, are designed to explore just this environment: a squelchy substrate that teems with life of all kinds, from tiny microbes to worms and snails, along with egg-size “nodules” of metals—such as copper, cobalt, nickel, and manganese—that are crucial for technologies worldwide.   Scientists and companies have long sought to probe the deep sea and bring such treasures to the surface. Orpheus, which spun off from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in 2024, could be well positioned to make those possibilities a lot more economical. The company has designed its vehicles on a simple philosophy: “deep for cheap,” says Jake Russell, Orpheus’s cofounder and CEO, who is a chemist by training. The vehicles cost a couple of hundred thousand dollars each to build, whereas existing options can range from $5 million to $10 million. And unlike most autonomous ocean vehicles, they can push into the seafloor and capture cores of sediment—and the creatures within.  Orpheus’s engineers have been tinkering with their deep-sea designs for years, much of the work taking place at WHOI and in collaboration with NOAA and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Its prototype vehicles were rated capable of diving to 11,000 meters—the deepest part of the Mariana Trench. They’ve completed two commercial deployments, but this new expedition marks the submersibles’ biggest test yet: operating over large ranges for multiple weeks and with multiple instruments at play. Using Rainier as their home base on the ocean’s surface, the vehicles will swim out for 10 kilometers at a time, taking one high-resolution image every second and up to eight physical samples from the seafloor apiece. If all goes well, the test could help establish the vehicles as a tool for government agencies, scientists, and companies that hope to probe the vastly understudied deep sea and the resources it holds. And while they’re not the only option on the market, Orpheus hopes their size and low building cost will soon make them one of the most accessible.  At present, to reach these depths scientists must wait for time on a limited and expensive set of submersibles owned by government agencies and research institutes. That formula lends itself better to capturing snapshots of the deep sea than it does to probing its interconnected ecological and biogeochemical systems. “A lot of this region that we’re surveying … has really never been explored in any kind of detail,” says Russell. “Anything we see is going to be new to NOAA and new to science.” A sediment specialist The Orpheus subs are classified as autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), which operate on a mix of preprogrammed commands and live decision-making and without being tethered to a ship. But unlike traditional AUVs engineered for long-distance, high-speed gliding, these submersibles are short and stout with little legs—better for making soft landings on the seafloor and then pushing into the mud to suck out sediment cores for scientists. When they do land, the submersibles can lift off the surface, thrust a few feet, and settle once more in a “hopping” fashion. Their bodies are made mostly of a buoyant material known as syntactic foam, with the important electronics encased in a thick sphere of glass. The same kind of foam, which is interspersed with hollow microspheres of glass to prevent it from collapsing under high pressures, went to the deep in the vehicle that carried the filmmaker James Cameron to the Mariana Trench in 2012; he even donated leftover material for use in earlier Orpheus prototypes.  At less than two meters in length and under 600 pounds (270 kilograms), Russell says the Orpheus robots are the smallest—and correspondingly the least expensive—ocean vehicles on the market capable of descending to 6,000 meters. They’re designed to populate future fleets of robotic explorers. The approach stems from a fundamental challenge, says Victoria Orphan, a geobiologist at the California Institute of Technology, who has previously worked with an Orpheus vehicle on a science campaign: “Anytime you do things in the deep ocean, you always run this risk, when you put something over the side [of a ship], that it might not come back.” With existing fleets of large, expensive vessels operated by groups like NOAA, WHOI, and the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI), losing a vehicle can be disastrous, not least because scientists must already compete for their limited time. In the spring of 2024, Orphan and her colleagues put an Orpheus sub through its paces during an expedition to study deep-sea methane seeps off the coast of Alaska’s Aleutian Islands. They hoped to use the vehicle to create maps of the area before the team sent down a human-crewed submersible called Alvin to study specific areas—and the microorganisms and animals that live there—in more detail.  But as with any sort of new type of technology, “there’s always growing pains,” recalls Orphan. Frigid temperatures and steep topography added unseen challenges, and it took the full three weeks for the sub to get high-resolution photographs of the seeps.  The setback didn’t dull Orphan’s excitement about the potential of these machines. “There’s a lot of real, unknown science right at that interface between the sediment and the ocean surface,” she says. “The Orpheus-type class of instrument, with the right kinds of sensors and samplers, could be a very enabling tool.” Russell envisions pairing the vehicles with specially designed payloads that can sense the heat of chemical seeps and detect plumes of sediment, DNA shed from ocean life-forms, or the magnetic tug of buried cables.  The vehicles are

Inexpensive seafloor-hopping submersibles could stoke deep-sea science—and mining Lire l’article »

AI, Committee, Actualités, Uncategorized

The Download: a new Christian phone network, and debugging LLMs

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. A new US phone network for Christians aims to block porn and gender-related content A new US-wide cell phone network marketed to Christians is set to launch next week. It blocks porn using network-level controls that can’t be turned off—even by adult account owners. It’s also rolling out a filter on sexual content aimed at blocking material related to gender and trans issues, optional but turned on by default across all plans. The trouble is, many websites don’t fit neatly into one category. That leaves its maverick founder with broad, subjective control over what is allowed or banned. Read the full story. —James O’Donnell This startup’s new mechanistic interpretability tool lets you debug LLMs The San Francisco–based startup Goodfire has released a new tool, Silico, that lets researchers peer inside an AI model and adjust its parameters during training. It could give users more control over how this technology is built than was once thought possible. The goal is to make building AI models less like alchemy and more like a science. Using a technique called mechanistic interpretability, Silico maps the neurons and pathways inside a model and lets developers tweak them to reduce unwanted behaviors or steer outputs. By exposing the “knobs and dials,” Goodfire hopes to bring AI training closer to traditional software engineering. Read the full story. —Will Douglas Heaven With mass firing, Trump deals a fresh blow to American science This past week delivered another gut punch for science in the US. This time, the target was the National Science Foundation—a federal agency that funds major research projects to the tune of around $9 billion. On Friday, the 22 scientists overseeing those efforts were all fired. Since 2025, the NSF has faced budget cuts, grant terminations, and mass firings, with staff numbers down sharply and many ambitious projects grinding to a halt. The result is a major shift in how American science is funded and governed. Discover what it means, and what’s next. —Jessica Hamzelou This article first appeared in The Checkup, MIT Technology Review’s weekly biotech newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Thursday, and read articles like this first, sign up here. China’s open-source bet: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now Silicon Valley AI companies follow a familiar playbook: keep the models behind an API and charge for access. China’s leading AI labs are playing a different game, releasing “open-weight” models that developers can download, adapt, and run on their own hardware. That approach went mainstream after DeepSeek open-sourced its R1 model, which matched top US systems at a fraction of the cost. It also won something subtler: goodwill with developers. A growing cohort of Chinese labs is now following the same blueprint. As AI shifts from hype to deployment, open-source models are making the future of AI more multipolar than Silicon Valley expected. Read the full story. —Caiwei Chen China’s open-source bet is one of the 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now, our list of the biggest ideas, trends, and advances in AI today. We’re unpacking one item from the list each day here in The Download, so stay tuned. The must-reads I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology. 1 Elon Musk has admitted that xAI trained Grok on OpenAI models“Distillation” is standard practice in AI, despite being legally dubious. (Wired $)+ The White House has accused Chinese firms using distillation of theft. (BBC)+ American labs are widely assumed to use similar techniques. (TechCrunch) 2 A “de-extinction” startup wants to resurrect a long-lost antelopeColossal Biosciences wants to bring back the bluebuck. (Axios)+ The company is using genomic editing to revive the animal. (Gizmodo)+ It previously claimed to have cloned red wolves. (MIT Technology Review) 3 ​​An OpenAI model outperformed ER doctors at diagnosing patientsBy analyzing health records data and information provided to physicians. (NPR)+ But it still must be proven in real-world clinical trials. (Vox) 4 Scientists are trying to power AI data centers with tiny nuclear reactorsThey could provide a new way to meet AI’s energy demands. (Gizmodo)+ We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. (MIT Technology Review) 5 Spotify has started verifying human artistsA new badge will distinguish them from AI. (The Guardian)+ Spotify has faced criticism for its handling of AI. (BBC) 6 The US is backing a Congolese railway to break China’s grip on critical mineralsThe old railroad is key to the race for critical metals in Africa. (Rest of World)+ The US is also searching for alternative sources. (MIT Technology Review) 7 Huawei is set to overtake Nvidia in China’s AI chip marketIt’s expected to capture the largest market share this year. (FT $) 8 Japan is building cardboard drones for the battlefieldThe flatpack designs are cheap, disposable, and built at scale. (404 Media) 9 The more young people use AI, the more they hate itResearch shows that Gen Z doesn’t trust GenAI. (The Verge) 10 A new organoid can menstruate—and show how tissue repairs itselfIt’s revealing how the uterus can shed without scarring. (Nature) Quote of the day “I suspect that there are a number of people who do not want to put the future of humanity in Mr Musk’s hands. But we’re not going to get into that.” —Judge Gonzalez Rogers rebukes attempts by Elon Musk’s lawyer to focus on AI’s existential risks as part of his lawsuit against OpenAI, the New York Times reports.  One More Thing TMY350 VIA WIKIMEDIA COMMONS This rare earth metal shows us the future of our planet’s resources The materials we need to power our world are shifting from fossil fuels to energy sources that don’t produce greenhouse gas emissions. Take neodymium, a rare earth metal used in powerful magnets that power everything from smartphones to wind turbines. Its story reveals many of the challenges we’ll likely face across the supply chain in

The Download: a new Christian phone network, and debugging LLMs Lire l’article »

AI, Committee, Actualités, Uncategorized

Operationalizing AI for Scale and Sovereignty

Companies are taking control of their own data to tailor AI for their needs. The challenge lies in balancing ownership with the safe, trusted flow of high‑quality data needed to power reliable insights. This conversation from MIT Technology Review’s EmTech AI conference examines how AI factories unlock new levels of scale, sustainability, and governance—positioning data control as a strategic imperative for governments and enterprises. About the speakers Chris Davidson, Vice President, HPC & AI Customer Solutions, HPE Chris Davidson is Vice President of HPC & AI Customer Solutions at Hewlett Packard Enterprise. He leads HPE’s global strategy for AI Factory solutions and Sovereign AI, working with governments, enterprises, and research institutions to build secure, scalable national- and enterprise-grade AI capabilities. He also directs Product Management and Performance Engineering across HPE’s HPC and AI portfolio, including large-model training platforms and Cray exascale systems. His teams define product strategy, performance architecture, and deployment models that position HPE at the forefront of high-performance and AI computing. During his nine years at HPE, Chris has led key initiatives across Performance Engineering, AI Cloud, and Professional Services, shaping how HPE delivers optimized, cloud-native, and globally deployed high-performance systems. He previously held technical and leadership roles in the biotech and medical diagnostics sectors. Chris holds an M.B.A. in Entrepreneurship and Finance and a B.S. in Biology from Loyola University Chicago. Arjun Shankar, Division Director, National Center for Computational Science, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Mallikarjun (Arjun) Shankar is the Division Director for the National Center for Computational Science at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. His research focuses on the interdisciplinary bridge between computer science and large-scale scientific discovery campaigns that rely on scalable computing and data science. He is a joint faculty appointee at the University of Tennessee’s Bredesen Center, a senior member of the IEEE and a senior member of the ACM.

Operationalizing AI for Scale and Sovereignty Lire l’article »

AI, Committee, Actualités, Uncategorized

Faithfulness-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Fact-Checking the Output of Retrieval Augmented Generation

arXiv:2505.21072v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) enhanced with retrieval, an approach known as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), have achieved strong performance in open-domain question answering. However, RAG remains prone to hallucinations: factually incorrect outputs may arise from inaccuracies in the model’s internal knowledge and the retrieved context. Existing approaches to mitigating hallucinations often conflate factuality with faithfulness to the retrieved evidence, incorrectly labeling factually correct statements as hallucinations if they are not explicitly supported by the retrieval. In this paper, we introduce FRANQ, a new method for hallucination detection in RAG outputs. FRANQ applies distinct uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques to estimate factuality, conditioning on whether a statement is faithful to the retrieved context. To evaluate FRANQ and competing UQ methods, we construct a new long-form question answering dataset annotated for both factuality and faithfulness, combining automated labeling with manual validation of challenging cases. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets, tasks, and LLMs show that FRANQ achieves more accurate detection of factual errors in RAG-generated responses compared to existing approaches.

Faithfulness-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Fact-Checking the Output of Retrieval Augmented Generation Lire l’article »

AI, Committee, Actualités, Uncategorized

IBM Releases Two Granite Speech 4.1 2B Models: Autoregressive ASR with Translation and Non-Autoregressive Editing for Fast Inference

IBM released two new open speech recognition models— Granite Speech 4.1 2B and Granite Speech 4.1 2B-NAR — and they make a compelling case for what a ~2B-parameter speech model can do. Both are available on Hugging Face under the Apache 2.0 license. The pair targets a specific problem that enterprise AI teams know well: most production-grade automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems either demand massive compute or sacrifice accuracy to stay within budget. IBM’s bet is that careful architecture decisions can let you have it both ways. What These Models Actually Do Granite Speech 4.1 2B is a compact and efficient speech-language model designed for multilingual automatic speech recognition (ASR) and bidirectional automatic speech translation (AST) covering English, French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, and Japanese. Its non-autoregressive counterpart, Granite Speech 4.1 2B-NAR, focuses exclusively on ASR — specifically targeting latency-sensitive deployments — and supports English, French, German, Spanish, and Portuguese, but not Japanese. That’s a meaningful distinction: teams that need Japanese transcription or any speech translation capability should reach for the standard autoregressive model. IBM also quietly released a third variant alongside these two. Granite Speech 4.1 2B-Plus adds speaker-attributed ASR and word-level timestamps for applications where knowing who said what — and exactly when — is a requirement. Word Error Rate (WER) is the primary metric for measuring transcription quality. Lower is better. A WER of 5% means roughly 5 out of every 100 words are wrong. On the Open ASR Leaderboard (as of April 2026), Granite Speech 4.1 2B scores a mean WER of 5.33. Drilling into benchmark detail — on LibriSpeech clean, the model achieves a WER of 1.33, and 2.5 on LibriSpeech other. The Architecture, Explained Both models share the same three-component design at a high level — a speech encoder, a modality adapter, and a language model — though the decoding mechanism diverges significantly. The first component is the speech encoder. The architecture uses 16 conformer blocks trained with Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) with two classification heads — one for graphemic (character-level) outputs and one for BPE units — using frame importance sampling to focus on informative parts of the audio. A Conformer is a neural network layer that combines convolutional layers (good at capturing local acoustic patterns) with attention mechanisms (good at capturing long-range dependencies). CTC is a training technique that lets the model learn from audio-text pairs without needing exact frame-level alignment. The second component is a speech-text modality adapter. A 2-layer window query transformer (Q-Former) operates on blocks of 15 1024-dimensional acoustic embeddings coming from the last conformer block, downsampling by a factor of 5 using 3 trainable queries per block and per layer — for a total temporal downsampling factor of 10 — resulting in a 10Hz acoustic embedding rate for the LLM. This adapter bridges the gap between continuous acoustic features and discrete text tokens, compressing the audio representation so the language model can process it efficiently. In the NAR model, the Q-Former has 160M parameters and downsamples the concatenated hidden representations from four encoder layers (layers 4, 8, 12, and 16). The third component is the language model. Granite Speech 4.1 2B uses an intermediate checkpoint of granite-4.0-1b-base with 128k context length, fine-tuned on all training corpora. In the NAR variant, this becomes a 1B-parameter bidirectional LLM editor — granite-4.0-1b-base with its causal attention mask removed to enable bidirectional context — adapted with LoRA at rank 128 applied to both attention and MLP layers. The Autoregressive vs. Non-Autoregressive Tradeoff This is where the two models diverge most sharply, and it has direct consequences for production deployment. In the standard Granite Speech 4.1 2B, text is generated autoregressively — one token at a time, each depending on every token before it. This produces accurate, stable transcripts with full support for AST, keyword-biased recognition, and punctuation, but is inherently sequential and slower at scale. Granite Speech 4.1 2B-NAR takes a fundamentally different approach. Rather than decoding tokens one at a time, it edits a CTC hypothesis in a single forward pass using a bidirectional LLM, achieving competitive accuracy with faster inference than autoregressive alternatives. This is the NLE (Non-autoregressive LLM-based Editing) architecture. Concretely: the CTC encoder produces a rough initial transcript, that hypothesis is interleaved with insertion slots, and then a bidirectional LLM predicts edits — copy, insert, delete, or replace — at all positions simultaneously in one pass. The NAR model measured an RTFx of approximately 1820 on a single H100 GPU using batched inference at batch size 128. RTFx (real-time factor multiplier) measures how many times faster than real time a model can process audio — an RTFx of 1820 means a one-hour audio file can be transcribed in under two seconds on that hardware. One practical constraint engineers should note: the NAR model requires flash_attention_2 for inference, since this backend supports sequence packing and respects the is_causal=False flag. Training Data and Infrastructure The two models were trained on different datasets. The standard model was trained on 174,000 hours of audio from public corpora for ASR and AST, as well as synthetic datasets tailored to support Japanese ASR, keyword-biased ASR, and speech translation. The NAR model was trained on approximately 130,000 hours of speech across five languages using publicly available datasets including CommonVoice 15, MLS, LibriSpeech, LibriHeavy, AMI, Granary VoxPopuli, Granary YODAS, Earnings-22, Fisher, CallHome, and SwitchBoard. The infrastructure gap between the two is equally telling. The standard model’s training was completed in 30 days — 26 days for the encoder and 4 days for the projector — on 8 H100 GPUs. The NAR model trained in just 3 days on 16 H100 GPUs (2 nodes) for 5 epochs — a much lighter training run, which reflects the architectural simplicity of editing over full autoregressive generation. Key Takeaways Here are 5 short key takeaways: IBM released two open ASR models — Granite Speech 4.1 2B (autoregressive) and Granite Speech 4.1 2B-NAR (non-autoregressive) — both ~2B parameters, and Apache 2.0 licensed. The standard model achieves a mean WER of 5.33

IBM Releases Two Granite Speech 4.1 2B Models: Autoregressive ASR with Translation and Non-Autoregressive Editing for Fast Inference Lire l’article »

AI, Committee, Actualités, Uncategorized

Cursor Introduces a TypeScript SDK for Building Programmatic Coding Agents With Sandboxed Cloud VMs, Subagents, Hooks, and Token-Based Pricing

Cursor, the AI-powered code editor, is opening up the core technology behind its coding agents to developers everywhere. The Cursor team announced the public beta of the Cursor SDK — a TypeScript library that gives engineers programmatic access to the same runtime, harness, and models that power Cursor’s desktop app, CLI, and web interface. This signals a meaningful shift in how AI coding tools are being positioned: not just as interactive assistants sitting alongside a developer, but as deployable infrastructure that organizations can wire into their existing systems. From Interactive Tool to Programmable Infrastructure If you’ve used Cursor before, you know it as an IDE where you interact with an agent in real time — asking it to write functions, fix bugs, or explain code. The Cursor SDK changes the access model. Instead of a developer sitting at a keyboard, the agent can now be invoked programmatically: from a CI/CD pipeline trigger, a backend service, or embedded directly inside another product. Think of it this way: previously, you had to be “in” Cursor to use its agents. Now, you can call those same agents from anywhere in your stack with a few lines of TypeScript. Getting started is a single command: Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser npm install @cursor/sdk From there, you create an Agent instance, send it a task, and stream the response back — all in TypeScript. Here’s the minimal example from Cursor’s announcement: Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser import { Agent } from “@cursor/sdk”; const agent = await Agent.create({ apiKey: process.env.CURSOR_API_KEY!, model: { id: “composer-2” }, local: { cwd: process.cwd() }, }); const run = await agent.send(“Summarize what this repository does”); for await (const event of run.stream()) { console.log(event); } The Agent.create() call accepts an apiKey, a model field (where you specify which model to run), and either a local or cloud configuration depending on where you want execution to happen. Why Building Your Own Agent Stack is Hard Before diving into what the SDK offers, it’s worth understanding the problem it solves. Building fast, reliable, and capable coding agents that run safely against your data requires meaningful engineering effort: secure sandboxing, durable state and session management, environment setup, and context management. And when a new model ships, dev teams often have to rework their agent loops entirely just to take advantage of it. The Cursor SDK eliminates this complexity so teams can focus on building useful agents instead of maintaining the underlying infrastructure. https://cursor.com/blog/typescript-sdk The Agent Harness: What “Same Runtime” Actually Means SDK agents use the same harness that powers Cursor’s own products. ‘Harness’ here refers to the full set of supporting infrastructure that makes an agent effective beyond just the LLM call itself. In Cursor’s case, that includes: Intelligent context management — Codebase indexing, semantic search, and instant grep so agents retrieve the right code context before generating responses. This is critical because LLMs are only as good as the context they receive; poor retrieval leads to hallucinated or irrelevant outputs. MCP servers — Agents launched through the SDK can connect to external tools and data sources over stdio or HTTP, either via a .cursor/mcp.json config file or passed inline in the API call. MCP (Model Context Protocol) is an open standard for wiring tools into agent runtimes. Skills — Agents automatically pick up reusable behavior definitions from a .cursor/skills/ directory in the repository. Hooks — A .cursor/hooks.json file lets you observe, control, and extend the agent loop across cloud, self-hosted, and local runtimes — useful for logging, guardrails, or custom orchestration. Subagents — The main agent can delegate subtasks to named subagents with their own prompts and models via the Agent tool, enabling multi-agent workflows without custom orchestration code. Cloud Deployment: Persistent, Sandboxed, and Resumable One of the more practical features of the SDK is cloud execution. When configured to run in Cursor’s cloud, each agent gets its own dedicated VM with strong sandboxing, a clone of the target repository, and a fully configured development environment. Critically, the agent keeps running even if the initiating machine goes offline — the developer can reconnect and stream the conversation later. Cloud agents integrate with Cursor’s existing Agents Window and web app, so a task started programmatically via the SDK can be inspected or taken over manually inside the Cursor interface. When the agent finishes, it can open a PR, push a branch, or attach demos and screenshots — making them suitable for asynchronous, unattended workflows: Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser const agent = await Agent.create({ apiKey: process.env.CURSOR_API_KEY!, model: { id: “gpt-5.5” }, cloud: { repos: [{ url: “https://github.com/cursor/cookbook”, startingRef: “main” }], autoCreatePR: true, }, }); const run = await agent.send(“Fix the auth token expiry bug”); console.log(`Started ${run.id}`); // …check back in later, from anywhere: const result = await ( await Agent.getRun(run.id, { runtime: “cloud”, agentId: run.agentId }) ).wait(); console.log(result.git?.branches[0]?.prUrl); For dev teams with security requirements, the SDK also supports self-hosted workers, where both code and tool execution remain inside the organization’s own network. Model Flexibility and Composer 2 The SDK exposes every model supported in Cursor. Switching models is a single field change in the model parameter, letting teams route tasks to the best model for a given combination of cost and capability. Cursor’s own Composer 2 — described as a specialized coding model achieving frontier-level performance at a fraction of the cost of general-purpose models — is positioned as the default recommendation for most coding agent tasks. Getting Started To accelerate adoption, Cursor has published a public cookbook repository on GitHub with four starter projects: a minimal quickstart (a Node.js example that creates a local agent, sends one prompt, and streams the response), a web-based prototyping tool for scaffolding new projects in a sandboxed cloud environment, an agent-powered kanban board that automatically opens PRs when engineers drag a card, and a lightweight coding agent CLI for spawning Cursor agents from the terminal. Cursor has also released a Cursor SDK plugin in the Cursor Marketplace to help developers start building directly from within the editor.

Cursor Introduces a TypeScript SDK for Building Programmatic Coding Agents With Sandboxed Cloud VMs, Subagents, Hooks, and Token-Based Pricing Lire l’article »

AI, Committee, Actualités, Uncategorized

The Download: the North Pole’s future and humanoid data

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. Digging for clues about the North Pole’s past In the past, getting to the North Pole involved a treacherous trip through ice many meters thick. But last year, a research vessel encountered open water and thin ice, which created an easy passage. It provided a reminder of how quickly the Arctic is changing.  Now scientists are digging deep below the seabed to find out if the Arctic Ocean was ever ice-free—and what that could mean for the future of Earth’s northernmost waters. Here’s what they hope to discover. —Tim Kalvelage This story is from the latest issue of our print magazine, which is all about nature. Check out the full issue here, and subscribe to get the next one when it lands.  Humanoid data: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now I was recently invited to join an app that would pay me to film myself doing tasks like putting food in a bowl and microwaving it. Another site asked if I’d like to remotely control a robotic arm to help improve its dexterity. What on earth is happening? These examples are just part of a growing push by robotics companies to collect data on our movements for training humanoids. As the race for real-world data heats up, our everyday movements are being turned into training data. Read the full story. —James O’Donnell Humanoid data is one of our 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now, a new look at the big ideas, trends, and technologies really worth your attention in the buzzy world of AI. The must-reads I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology. 1 Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta have all set AI spending recordsCollectively, they’re up 71% on the same quarter last year.  (NYT $)+ Microsoft, Google and Amazon reported big payoffs from the splurge. (FT $)+ But Meta’s shares slid after its plans spooked investors. (BBC)+ What even is the AI bubble? (MIT Technology Review) 2 The White House opposes Anthropic’s plan to expand Mythos accessIt’s concerned about the model’s cyber risks. (Bloomberg $)+ And worried that the government will lose compute access. (WSJ $)+ Anthropic is seeking funding at a valuation over $900 billion. (Bloomberg $) 3 Elon Musk has claimed OpenAI’s leaders “looted the nonprofit”During testimony, Musk said he “was a fool” for trusting them. (Gizmodo)+ But he had raised his own concerns about OpenAI’s non-profit status. (The Verge)+ The case could reshape the AI landscape. (MIT Technology Review) 4 Autonomous vehicles may be worseningAccording to emergency first-responders, glitches are increasing. (Wired) 5 OpenAI has abandoned much of its Stargate planIt will no longer develop its own data centers. (FT $)+ The project’s compute requirements have been questioned. (MIT Technology Review) 6 A convicted Harvard scientist is rebuilding a brain-computer lab in ChinaHe had previously been named the world’s top chemist. (Reuters $) + But was then convicted for lying about payments from China. (NYT $) 7 Families have sued OpenAI over a mass shooter’s use of ChatGPTThey say OpenAI provided a dangerously defective version of the chatbot. (NPR) 8 Apple is reportedly close to giving up on the Vision ProAfter the latest model flopped. (MacRumors)  9 Senators are interrogating US AI firms on safeguards against ChinaOver fears of IP theft. (Axios) 10 Friendly AI chatbots are more likely to be inaccurateA new study found kinder answers contained more mistakes. (BBC) Quote of the day “Never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user’s query.”  —OpenAI instructs Codex to avoid critter talk in a system prompt for the coding agent, Ars Technica reports. One More Thing ARTHUR MOUNT Is this the most energy-efficient way to build homes? When engineers began designing an ultra-efficient home in the 1970s, they realized the trick wasn’t generating energy in a greener way, but using less of it. They needed to make a better thermos, not a cheaper coffee maker. That idea helped inspire today’s passive-house standard: airtight buildings that can cut energy use by up to 90% through better windows, insulation, and ventilation. Although they’re often considered a cold-climate approach, passive houses actually have universal benefits. Find out what makes them so efficient. —Patrick Sisson We can still have nice things A place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.) + Finally, someone built a gaming PC inside a microwave that runs DOOM.+ Experience the rhythm of the city through this rapid-fire collage of urban photography.+ Get a dose of pure cuteness as these tiny snow leopard cubs leave their den for the first time.+ If you’re staring at a random assortment of groceries, SuperCook will find a recipe based on what’s already in your pantry.

The Download: the North Pole’s future and humanoid data Lire l’article »

We use cookies to improve your experience and performance on our website. You can learn more at Politique de confidentialité and manage your privacy settings by clicking Settings.

Privacy Preferences

You can choose your cookie settings by turning on/off each type of cookie as you wish, except for essential cookies.

Allow All
Manage Consent Preferences
  • Always Active

Save
fr_FR